The academic freedom of the university is protected, and who can guarantee the reputation of ***?A professor at a university in South Korea said that it can be regarded as a woman who has been sentenced by the local court in the first instance, and although the judgment is an infringement of the right to reputation, it does not constitute a crime!
If the Constitution highly guarantees academic freedom and the freedom of professors at universities, is it also the freedom of professors to express such speech based on some narrow perception or for some ulterior motive? Whether it is based on the need for academic research or the need for self-interest should be the basic criterion for distinguishing between crime and punishment in professors.
The verdict given by the Korean District Court based on the constitution does not calm the anger of *** and its descendants! So who will protect *** and its descendants? The physical and psychological injuries they suffered could not wait for the sincere apology of the Japanese, and not only that, South Korea's ** gave a vague understanding of the word ***, and publicly stated that this is history has passed, and South Korea should not stick to history and stand still.
It is conceivable that there will be a new breakthrough in the cognition of South Korea in the next step, that is, the theory of victim guilt!
The professor *** can be regarded as a **female, and has actually set the tone for the crusade against the **female!
It's really for the sake of profit, you can do without face, you can pick up the graves of three generations of grandparents and grandchildren, and expose the corpses for thousands of years!