(This article is based on Mr. Sima Nan's ** program, and the content has been deleted).
Recently, the great discussion on emancipating the mind in Hunan Province has aroused tremendous repercussions throughout the country, and I have paid more attention to this topic, and I have repeatedly read the notice of the Hunan Provincial Party Committee to learn from everyone's interpretation of this issue.
There is a ready-made example of the Great Emancipation Debate, where Apple was fined 500 million euros in Europe.
Is it possible to understand that Apple was fined 500 million euros in Europe with the concept of emancipation, and can also draw inferences from this example and think about the American multinational pharmaceutical giant Pfizer stuffing money in China1Can the question of $800 million be understood in terms of the concept of emancipating the mind?
We know that Apple is very bigIn some countries, Apple is a god-like existence, and the treatment of the old lady plus the top VIP, lest the service is not thoughtful enough, but the European Union is not used to it, and a fine of 500 million euros is raised.
Why punish apples? According to Chinese terms, capital grows savagely, making people unaccustomed to it, and violating the EU's monopoly law. To put it simply, Apple walks without looking at traffic lights, violating traffic rules.
If you are specific, this reason can't be smaller, Apple has some small flaws in the **stream** service, the fee is a little cheaper, and it was fined 500 million euros for this matter, and the EU is so strict.
The Financial Times said on the 18th that some companies have complained to former EU regulators against Apple, accusing Apple of prohibiting all kinds of applications to notify customers that there are other cheaper subscription services outside of the Apple App Store. The meaning of this sentence is more winding, and its core meaning is that it is cheaper.
The European Union then launched an investigation into whether Apple had committed anti-competitive behavior, and the European Commission found that Apple had violated relevant EU regulations and decided to fine it 500 million euros.
The example I gave is to talk about the problem from the perspective of emancipating the mind. I want to ask, can we also emancipate our minds, treat those multinational companies, as well as all domestic companies equally, if it runs a red light, then call it over, and ask it if it sees a red light? Ran a red light when you saw it? Then open a bill, fine, and leave.
With the recent discussion on emancipating the mind so lively, can we also emancipate our minds on this issue? We don't have to give supra-national treatment to certain enterprises, can we reflect the seriousness, compulsion and inescapability of Chinese laws? Even if the king of heaven Lao Tzu came and violated Chinese law, he should be punished.
Pfizer PR in China, its 1Where did the $6.8 billion in PR expenses go? Who took Pfizer's money? Where did Pfizer's money go? I'll have to give an explanation! This matter is not said by us Chinese ourselves, but by the big melon that the United States has poked out itself, and the lawsuit has gone to the court.
In 2019, the American company Pfizer spent 1$6.8 billion to public relations with authoritative figures in the medical community of the People's Republic of China, the cost of public relations is understandable, but this figure is too high, this figure is more than 10 times the amount of public relations expenses in other countries during the same period. Such a shocking fact, don't mention it in black and don't mention it in white?
Not only that, but some people still have to stand up to defend Pfizer, which they can't even say. You don't know what I've been scolded for, just because I've mentioned it a few times.
Shouldn't this be investigated? It's not easy to check, I don't dare to check, I can't check, I can't check, it's inconvenient to check, so why not emancipate my mind?
It all started because there was a senior employee within Pfizer who had a very special job and was the director of global compliance analytics within Pfizer. The simplest understanding is that selling drugs to the world is to stuff money, but you can't stuff too much money, and the global market has to stuff money. So why is the most money being given to China? In response to this problem, people came to the court to expose the matter from the perspective of Pfizer's internal non-compliance, of course, they did not say who gave the money to or who took the money.
It's been a while since this happened, and I haven't forgotten it. Friends who are familiar with me know that I sometimes like to take it out and talk about it, why is Sima Nan talking about this? Curiosity kills cats.
Now, can we use the concept of the Hunan Provincial Party Committee's emancipation of the mind to analyze and figure out where Pfizer's public relations expenses have gone? Let us listen to the sound and know some of the root causes.
Finally, I still have a doubt, the EU fined Apple 500 million euros, how can people be so emancipated by the EU mind? Can't we get this done from start to finish, as the EU does?
Editor-in-charge: Hu Yan Penfu.
Section** Network.