Our Britain has offended the three countries, what kind of trouble?
The three British countries were offended, and it became a joke in the world!
If you hadn't seen it with your own eyes, you wouldn't have believed it. This time, why did Britain anger Russia, Argentina and China, the three bosses and difficult guys? It's almost offended the world, is your brain in water?!
In other words, recently Prime Minister Sunak announced more than 50 sanctions against Russia in one go, and also provided Ukraine with 200 "Brimstone" missiles. To be honest, this is not a broken casserole asking what the hell is? Why do you fight so hard? Do you think that with the United States, you can do whatever you want?
China has also become part of this farce, and the British side actually sanctioned Chinese companies for the so-called "support for Russia's war against Ukraine", which is really shit luck, stepping on the tail of so many countries, and daring to say cool things. The Chinese Embassy in the UK responded directly, criticizing the sanctions as having no basis in international law and defending the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies. Well said, don't think I'm a bully.
The Russian side was even more stubborn, directly announcing its withdrawal from the fishing agreement signed with the United Kingdom, which was actually signed during the Cold War and has a history of more than 60 years, allowing British ships to fish in Russian waters. As a result, Russia has the final say, and now it has to "withdraw from the group" and leave no way for the development of the British fishing industry. In the words of Russian State Duma Chairman Volodin, last year the British ship caught 55 in Russian waters60,000 tons of fish, to put it playfully: "It's time for them to reduce ** and become smarter." ”
This Russian countermeasure has to be admired, steady and ruthless, not only causing them harm in substance, but also a little insulting. It's really open-minded to deal with Western countries, if I didn't see it, I really wouldn't believe it.
Now, Britain is not only merciless to Russia, but also has an unpleasant quarrel with Argentina. Foreign Secretary David Cameron went to the Falklands and said that Falkland would be absolutely welcome if he wanted to be part of Britain. Argentina didn't do anything about this, and directly ridiculed the full skills, saying that he was grateful to Cameron for visiting Argentina and welcomed him to the Argentine capital next time. The two foreign ministers also met at the G20 foreign ministers' summit in Rio, and Argentine Foreign Minister Mundino was unambiguous, reiterating sovereignty claims and expressing dissatisfaction with Cameron. Mondino even revealed that the possibility of Argentine Milley meeting with Russia's Putin is not ruled out.
This situation is really that Britain has not only offended China and Russia, but also has trouble getting along with Argentina. Britain has to be more restrained, especially a lot of domestic problems, offending so many countries, isn't it asking for trouble? This will only make the region that already has the idea of separation more determined, and Britain, once an empire on which the sun never sets, will not reach out to help as soon as it enters this dead end, and may even take the opportunity to reap some benefits.
But wait, Britain's actions are inevitably too hot, and people can't see through whether they are brave and fearless, or self-destructive in their future. Let's put aside our assumptions and return to the starting point.
The beginning of this international drama was when British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak announced a new round of sanctions against Russia. This news is like a bomb, which not only angered China and Russia for a while, but even Argentina was involved. Britain actually dared to offend the three countries at one time, is this heroic fearlessness, or is it a head caught in the door?
The Prime Minister's decision to sanction the Prime Minister, particularly focused on Chinese companies, provoked a strong response from the Chinese Embassy in the UK. They bluntly criticized the sanctions imposed by the British side and stressed China's fair position on the Ukraine issue. It seems that the UK has sanctioned Chinese companies on the grounds of so-called "support for Russia's war against Ukraine", which makes everyone incomprehensible. Is this really confident, or does it dare to act so senselessly and recklessly with the United States in mind?
Then, the reaction of the Russian side came even more violently, directly announcing that it had withdrawn from a fishing agreement signed with the United Kingdom. This agreement was actually reached during the Cold War and has a history of more than 60 years, but the United Kingdom** triggered Russia's "withdrawal from the group" action because of sanctions against Russia. Putin broke it down: British ships captured 5560,000 tons of fish, they are now going to "withdraw from the group", maybe they will let the British fishermen reduce ** and become smarter.
This series of countermeasures gives the impression that Russia's response is quite decisive and even insulting. Russian State Duma Chairman Volodin's statement is even more unsparing, bluntly saying that withdrawing from the fishing agreement is a response to British sanctions. It seems that Britain is actually asking for trouble by taking the initiative to provoke trouble.
At a time when Britain is riveting its efforts to suppress and sanction Russia, Argentina has launched friendly cooperation with Russia, which has made the love-hate relationship between Britain and Argentina even more confusing. British Foreign Secretary David Cameron visited the Falklands and said that as long as the Falkland Islands wanted to be part of the British family, Britain would absolutely welcome them. This remark immediately aroused Argentina's disgust, and Argentine Foreign Minister Mondino directly ridiculed the full skills, thanking Cameron for his visit to Argentina and welcoming him directly to the Argentine capital next time.
The development of this British farce raises questions about British foreign policy. In international affairs, it may not be wise to take the initiative to stir up trouble. Not only did it provoke at the same time on the Sino-Russian issue, but it also made a mess of relations with Argentina. In the face of endless domestic problems, offending other countries too much will only lead to more social problems.
As we all know, a country's foreign policy often affects the country's image and international status. Britain used to be an empire on which the sun never sets, but in this eventful time, their diplomatic moves are worrying. Blindly offending other countries may eventually strengthen the idea of secession in those regions that were already thinking of secession from Britain. If the momentum of this separation gets out of control, Britain may end up in a dead end, and the so-called allies may not come to the rescue, but take advantage of the opportunity.
All in all, this farce of the British Three Kingdoms offending is a ridiculous drama. Perhaps Britain should be a little more restrained in international affairs, weigh the pros and cons, and avoid stepping on its own feet when dancing solo on the international stage. After all, diplomacy requires wisdom and poise, not recklessness in the glory of the past.