Capital is now having enough of it, and women are going to start playing with men.
I don't think the collapse of the dog-licking economy is a defeat for consumerism, on the contrary, it is actually a high-end plan for capital to target men.
Why?
Many days have passed since Valentine's Day 2024, and this Valentine's Day is very rare and very calm. This is the first Valentine's Day after the first year of the awakening of the licking dog, and how many goddesses have not received gifts, flowers, or even invitations to watch movies and eat hot pot.
You know, on Valentine's Day before, what kind of man was 520? The princesses gave you the last of their youth, what's wrong with spending some money? The princesses don't think you're poor, they care about your attitude, and making you pay is nothing more than to test you.
The main one is that on Valentine's Day, all of women's spending is paid for by men. Don't ask what the reason is, the goddess must enjoy the feeling of being noticed, flattered, and cared for, and it is natural that they should accept male offerings.
On the other hand, before they even waited for the next day, the second-hand trading platform was flooded with all kinds of new and unopened women's goods, such as clothes, shoes, hats, cosmetics, mobile phones, headphones, digital products, brand-name bags, etc. Don't ask**, the question is sent by the licking dog, and there has even been a second order for licking the dog to return the gift to the goddess. At that time, when the licking dogs licked out of the huge economic market, countless women-related industries benefited for more than 10 years.
In fact, men have been spending money to buy goods or services for women for reasons such as emotional expression, gaining favor with women, and stabilizing relationships with women, which has existed since ancient times. In the cognition of many male friends, it is natural to give to women, and they can get a sense of accomplishment and pleasure in the process of taking care of and providing for their lovers. Just as some women naturally think that having children and taking care of the house can bring a sense of security and achievement.
There is nothing inherently wrong with these perceptions, and everyone has the freedom to choose their own lifestyle, including behavior and consumption decisions in relationships. This freedom is an expression of social progress and individual rights, and while it should be respected, it must also be subject to certain boundaries.
When the licking dogs repeatedly lower their bottom line and let go of their personality to please the goddess, let her go crazy, let her indulge, and think that one day she will be moved and come to sing about our love again.
But the reality is often that he wants to please me, what can I do, who I choose is my freedom, and why do you define my freedom with your efforts.
Therefore, until all the dreams have been shattered, I saw the tears and regrets of licking the dog, and they sighed that I gave you freedom too much, and on the other hand, they also figured it out and woke up through it.
Earn 5800 a month, don't lick the dog and spend it casually, a man's money is never spent on a woman, but for a woman to see, instead of pleasing a woman, it is better to please yourself, spending money as a licking dog is better to travel, than to be someone else's licking dog, it is better to be your own licking dog.
As such, men began to focus on virtual props, games, equipment, digital products and other consumer items in games, and such consumption has ushered in a wave of vigorous development.
Do you think that's all I say? No, it's the point. Earn 5800 a month, is there a problem with not licking the dog and spending it casually.
Yes, because this sentence only gives two choices, either as a licking dog and for the goddess to spend as much as you want, or as you like. In both cases, in the end, it is a flower. Why do you have to spend it?
Speaking of which, we have to mention the essence of consumerism, the alienation of capital from people, from I exist so I consume, to I consume so I exist, I need to rely on material things to prove that I live in this world, and I live well.
Therefore, you think that you have awakened and should not lick the dog, but in fact, you have not accumulated much wealth, and the capital will advocate another set of words to let you continue to spend happily. If you continue to say that what you spend is your own, then you are still in my perception of consumption, so I exist.
Therefore, what can defeat consumerism is never to consume in a different way, but to change the fundamental cognition of consumption, get rid of the alienation of capital from people, and return to the essence of consumption.
Of course, I'm also trying hard, keep my wallet, be myself, this sentence is for you, and for myself.