Not at all! The US Secretary of State openly stated that you are not on the table, you are on the m

Mondo International Updated on 2024-02-26

Before reading this article, we invite you to click it"Follow".button, so that you can continue to push such articles in the future, and it is also convenient for you to discuss and share, and your support is the driving force for us to persist in creating

Although US hegemonism is a tacit reality that the whole world knows, after all, modern politics always has to put on a cloak of warmth and affection, and the United States will not admit in public that it is pursuing hegemony.

The United States puts on a "democratic" cloak for hegemony)

For many years, the United States has always used the banner of "freedom," "democracy," and "human rights" in its foreign interference, and whether others believe it or not, they have to find a suitable reason for their actions anyway.

However, seeing that such a "roundabout" way is difficult to stop China's rise, the United States simply does not pretend.

At the Munich Security Conference some time ago, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken openly threatened countries to "not be on the table, but on the menu", asking them to choose sides between China and the United States.

The United States has put on the cloak of "democracy and freedom" for its hegemony

Since the Second World War, all countries in the world have realized the importance of peaceful development, and the purpose of the United Nations is to maintain world peace and security.

The Charter of the United Nations specifically states the need to develop friendly relations among nations on the basis of respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples.

Under this international trend, even the United States and Western countries, especially the United States, which became a superpower after World War II, still have hegemonism in their hearts, but in their actions, they still have to cover up.

As a result, they have found a beautiful banner for their various actions, that is, "freedom, democracy, and human rights."

Under such banners, they have launched wars again and again against countries and regions that do not conform to their own interests and ideologies, and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are typical examples.

Although everyone knows that the United States is in fact engaged in hegemonism, even scholars in the United States admit that the actions of the United States have nothing to do with "democracy" at all, but are motivated by geopolitical purposes.

American scholars admit that the purpose of the United States' foreign wars has nothing to do with democracy).

However, in any case, the United States has given an "explanation" to the outside world, and considering the overwhelming superiority of the United States over other countries since the collapse of the Soviet Union, other countries cannot do anything with the United States, but can only condemn it.

But this condemnation, the United States does not care.

U.S. intervention in China failed

Under the banner of "national freedom," the United States has cleaned up one opponent after another, and even the Soviet Union, which was once able to compete with the United States, has collapsed under the infiltration offensive of the United States, and most of the wealth accumulated over many years of construction has been swallowed up by the United States and its allies.

Other small and medium-sized countries, which are regarded as not in the interests of the United States, are even more powerless in the face of the hegemonist offensive of the United States, which is called "liberal democracy."

With regard to the Soviet Union, the United States was so wary of the Soviet Union's military strength that it only engaged in economic and cultural infiltration, but these small and medium-sized countries did not deserve such a fear from the United States.

Iraq War).

The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are the United States' efforts to clean up those who are disobedient in the name of "democracy and freedom".

The United States claims that it wants to bring "democracy and prosperity" to the local area, but in fact, they only bring poverty and death to the local people.

However, all the methods of the United States failed when it encountered China.

Since the beginning of the Cold War, the United States, as an "adversary" in the ideological field, has not forgotten China while smearing and slandering the Soviet Union.

And the economic and cultural infiltration offensive of the United States was not only aimed at the Soviet Union, but also used China as little.

After realizing China's rise, the United States has carried out all-round suppression of China.

The United States suppresses China).

This includes blaming and pressuring China on issues related to Xinjiang, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Tibet, and the South China Sea, imposing sanctions and containment on China in the fields of science and technology, finance, diplomacy, and military, and isolating and excluding China in international organizations and mechanisms.

However, even with the best of the United States, China's society remains stable and even maintains a strong momentum of development, which makes the United States feel uneasy.

The United States does not pretend

Seeing that China's rise is unstoppable, and has even posed a challenge to the US hegemonic system, causing cracks in the US hegemonic system, the United States is so angry that it can no longer even care about the fig leaf of "freedom and democracy".

At the 60th Munich Security Conference in Germany, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, who represented the United States at the meeting, made a surprising speech in a discussion on the 17th.

Blinken is outspoken and astonishing)

Asked about "allies" in the U.S.-China competition, Blinken said that for the U.S., "if you're not sitting at the table, you're on the menu."

He informed the moderator that the United States** was already asking other countries to make a choice.

Although the United States has actually done this for many years, as soon as this kind of explicit remarks came out, it still caused a big uproar, and even American netizens couldn't believe what they heard.

After all, in modern society, everyone is talking about peaceful development and respecting other countries' internal political choices, and such aggressive remarks are really rare in the political arena.

In particular, China has become the world's second largest economy and has deep ties with other countries in the world, but the United States has opened its mouth to let other countries choose between China and the United States, and threatens to become a target of the United States if it does not choose the United States.

American netizens couldn't believe it)

You must know that even the United States itself, while competing fiercely with China, will continue to cooperate with China in "areas of cooperation" for its own interests.

In contrast, in the course of China's foreign exchanges, it has always emphasized that China's diplomacy and cooperation with other countries do not involve third countries.

The United States must realize that it is wrong to think that they are the leader and leader of the world, that their own interests and values are the interests and values of the world, and that their will and decisions are the will and decisions of the world.

The world pattern has changed, the trend of multipolarization has become unstoppable, and the United States will eventually usher in a backlash by forcibly imposing its will on other countries and endangering the interests of other countries.

Information**

Blinken's explicit speech shocked netizens: In the international system, if you don't sit at the table, you will appear on the menu Globo.com.

February** Dynamic Incentive Program

Related Pages