In terms of economy, the economic structure of China and the United States is highly complementary and there is a broad space for cooperation. Therefore, even if the United States claims to engage in a so-called "first-class war" and carry out "economic decoupling" with China, it is still difficult to do so in reality, and the amount between China and the United States is still not small. However, at the same time, on the one hand, the United States has sought from China at various levels, including economy and diplomacy, but on the other hand, it still has a residual grip on the so-called "Cold War mentality" and has launched military provocations around China many times, which has become the biggest spoiler of the situation around China and the biggest saboteur of regional peace. What is even more outrageous is that the United States still likes to "fight backwards" and blame China for changing the "status quo" in the region and stirring up the regional situation.
Whether it is the disputes between China and South Korea and China and Japan over islands and reefs in the East China Sea, or the increasingly tense situation in the Taiwan Strait, or Ren'ai Jiao and Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea, the shadow of the United States is inseparable behind them. In the East China Sea, the Taiwan Strait, the South China Sea, and other places, the United States has brazenly used Japan, Taiwan, the Philippines, and other "small partners" as a starting point to stir up regional tensions, resulting in an increasingly intense regional situation. As an extraterritorial country, the United States has traveled thousands of miles and worked tirelessly to provoke trouble at China's doorstep, and it has vividly displayed its ugly features as a "war-torn country."
Recently, Biden's close aide to the United States, US affairs assistant Jake Sullivan said that if China continues to carry out "provocations" in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait, then the United States will cooperate more closely with its allies and partners and counterattack China, his remarks can be described as very arrogant. But at the same time, the U.S. side also said it would also cooperate with China in "certain areas where interests coincide."
Sullivan's remarks once again demonstrate the ambivalence of the United States in "wanting and wanting," and on the one hand, the United States hopes to interrupt China's vigorous and upward pace of development by means of containment and suppression. On the other hand, there is hope and seeking cooperation with China in various fields, and hopes that China can help the United States out of its predicament. Under such a tangled mentality, we often see that there will be many "inconsistencies" in the United States' dealings with China.
In this regard, China's Foreign Minister Wang Foreign Minister has already said in advance, and when Foreign Minister Wang and Sullivan met, he pointed out in a solemn and solemn manner: All countries have the greatest concerns, but they must be legitimate and reasonable, and they must not engage in pan-securitization, let alone use this to contain and suppress the development of other countries. It can be seen that the Chinese side still shows its magnanimity towards the United States and shows that it understands the United States to a certain extent, but more importantly, China has also warned the United States against the improper behavior of other countries.
As for China's painstaking persuasion, I still hope that the US side can understand it!