The British are really pushing Europe into the fire pit this time! Everyone knows that the Russian-Ukrainian war has been fought so far, and Russia has not had much pressure. After all, as far as the Ukrainian army's strength is concerned, for the Russian army, it can't set off any storms at all.
However, at this time, the British are going to brush up on their "sense of existence" and shout loudly that they will send NATO troops to the Russian-Ukrainian battlefield to assist the Ukrainian army before May.
Do you think there will be differences of opinion among NATO members? I think the embarrassing scene of the United States in the Red Sea is obvious to all friends. Even the United States can't call its allies when it fights a Houthi, not to mention that the opponent is a powerful Russia.
Why do the British feel that they have a stronger appeal than the Americans? It is indeed ironic to think about it, and this has to mention the "glorious deeds" of the British in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. During this time, the British were indeed not idle, following the United States and launching many raids against the Houthis in Yemen. Even Britain had previously announced in advance the offensive plan of Britain and the United States. Obviously, the British, who followed the United States and attacked Houthi bases and repeatedly succeeded, were somewhat "floating".
Do you still think that you are an empire on which the sun never sets? All I know is that the British ships staged a "bitter meat trick" in the Middle East. If it is not a coincidence that their own ships collided with each other and made a "big hole" in the hull, then did the British, because they were afraid, be dragged to the Red Sea by the United States and used as a "shield" to play such a "play"? I think it's very suspicious.
Let's go back to the Russian-Ukrainian battlefield, the British, just their own cowardice is the courage of the first, and they feel that with a wave of their arms, they can make the NATO legions rush up?
Now NATO is indeed conducting military exercises, and it is also clearly aimed at Russia, but the problem is that it is another matter to be serious with Russia. The Americans will probably be the first not to agree! As NATO's leading big brother, the Americans are well aware that if a new battlefield is opened, it will face great challenges for NATO, which has the United States as its capital.
Moreover, the Russian side has long warned NATO that if NATO really ends up fighting the Russian army and breaking through Russia's "red line", it is tantamount to forcing Russia to press the "nuclear button" and drag the world to the brink of nuclear war.
The Americans, in fact, are well aware of what kind of reaction Russia will make. Therefore, in countries similar to Finland and other countries located on the border with Russia, military agreements were signed early, naval and air bases were arranged in advance, as well as ammunition warehouses for storing armaments, and the nuclear ** deployed by the United States in Europe is already very close to Russia.
Obviously, the "card" of NATO has been used by the United States many times to put pressure on Russia, and Britain is just here to join in the fun.
But in my opinion, the British have always opposed the Russian-Ukrainian peace talks, with the aim of making the European continent a mess, and Britain is the only one. Russia's approach to Britain is estimated to have been unhappy for a long time, and if Russia really comes to the point of using nuclear weapons, it is estimated that Britain will be the first to be targeted in Europe.
The Americans are dying, and the British are also dying, but Britain's selfishness is to gamble on the future of Europe and change the chance for the British to rise again.