Recently, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) accused Hamas of using a large amount of Chinese-made equipment in the Gaza Strip, which has aroused widespread concern in the international community. However, this accusation was directly debunked in the response of the Chinese Ministry of National Defense, with Senior Colonel Wu Qian emphasizing that China has never provided any ** equipment to the conflict zone, revealing the inaccuracy of Israel's statements and hinting at the hypocrisy of some Western countries. Next, we will analyze the incident from multiple angles and restore the truth.
1.The IDF evaded responsibility
The devastation of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has attracted international attention. In the face of the rudimentary Hamas, the Israeli army could not hide its crotch pulling, and did not even dare to release the real ** data. In this weak situation, the IDF chose to point the finger at the ** used by Hamas, in an attempt to divert attention by splashing dirty water and achieve the goal of shirking responsibility. However, it turns out that the IDF's accusation of making in China is not real, and this behavior is undoubtedly a very unwise choice in the international arena.
2.The trap of condemnation: The Israeli army has lost more than just prestige on the battlefield
In the destruction of Israeli tanks and armored vehicles filmed by Hamas, the ** used by Hamas were mainly RPG rockets and AK47 rifles from Russia, which had nothing to do with the Chinese-made ** that the IDF accused. While the IDF condemns China, it turns a blind eye to the West** in the hands of Hamas, and this obvious double standard makes the accusations of the Israeli army even more absurd. In fact, Hamas has a large number of Western-made ones in its arsenal of anti-tanks, including the NLAW anti-tank system that Britain has aided to Ukraine. By choosing to ignore this reality and turn its focus to China, the IDF is merely engaged in tactical distractions in an attempt to cover up its predicament.
3.A righteous act of China's assistance
In response, China's Ministry of National Defense emphasized the three principles that China strictly adheres to in the export of military goods, namely, contributing to the legitimate self-defense capability of the recipient country, not undermining peace and stability, and not interfering in the internal affairs of the recipient country. This shows that China is a country with a principled bottom line, which is fundamentally different from the unscrupulous approach of some countries in order to make money. There is no conclusive evidence that the ** used by Hamas came from Chinese aid, and the IDF's accusations are actually motivated by jealousy and helplessness for China's just actions to safeguard the rights of the Palestinian people.
4.Israel's "riot maneuver": a diplomatic approach to disappointment
In the early days of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, Israel chose to attack China, accusing China of not supporting it, which can only arouse the disgust of Chinese young people to a certain extent. Israel's series of "riotous operations" not only failed to ** Chinese young people again, but aroused their curiosity about the truth. By digging deeper, netizens found that the false image constructed by Israel in China's "** propaganda has collapsed, and the disappointment of this diplomatic method can be seen. Israel should not underestimate the ability of China's younger generation to access information and their sensitivity to justice, otherwise it will be counterproductive.
Conclusion
The IDF's accusations that Hamas uses Chinese-made equipment appear untenable in the face of facts. China's principled stance on arms exports and its just support for Hamas make Israel's accusations seem ridiculous. The international community should look at this incident rationally and not be deceived by Israel's operations, and the real facts are the most convincing. The Israeli military should face up to its own performance in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, rather than trying to divert attention by smearing other countries.