Matter is a collection of ideas in the battle between analyticism and objectivism
In the history of philosophy and scientific thought, the understanding of the nature and properties of "things" has always been the focus of debate. Among them, analyticism and objectivism are two representative views. Analyticism asserts that objects are a collection of ideas, while objectivism emphasizes the independent existence of things. This article will analyze these two points of view and the controversy between them.
Analyticism holds that our knowledge of things is acquired through the analysis of ideas. Objects themselves are intangible and insubstantial, and all we know are the various properties or characteristics of things. These attributes or characteristics are perceived by our senses and form ideas in our consciousness. Therefore, a thing is a collection of ideas, our subjective cognition of the properties of things.
Objectivism, on the other hand, holds that things exist independently of people. The essence and properties of things exist objectively and do not depend on human consciousness or perception. What we perceive through our senses is only the superficial phenomenon of an object, not its essence. To understand the nature of things, it is necessary to rely on scientific methods to conduct observations and experiments.
The controversy between analyticism and objectivism mainly focuses on the understanding of the nature and properties of things. Analyticism emphasizes the subjectivity of our cognition of things, believing that our knowledge of things is only obtained through the analysis of ideas. Objectivism, on the other hand, holds that the essence and properties of things exist objectively and do not depend on human consciousness or perception.
In scientific practice, both analyticism and objectivism have their scope and limitations. In some fields, such as psychology, sociology, etc., the analytic approach is more applicable because it emphasizes the in-depth study of subjective experience and behavior. In the fields of natural sciences such as physics and chemistry, the objectivist approach is more important, because the objects of study in these fields have the essence and attributes of objective existence.
In conclusion, analyticism and objectivism are controversial in their understanding of the nature and properties of "things". Analyticism emphasizes the subjectivity of our cognition of things, while objectivism holds that the nature and properties of things exist objectively. In scientific practice, both perspectives have their scope and limitations. Understanding the controversy between these two perspectives helps us to understand the nature and properties of things more comprehensively, and promotes the development and progress of science.
Materials** on the Internet.