"The best time for China to surrender to the United States is now at hand, you just need to surrender standing up, you don't have to kneel, and once you miss it, there will be no more! This sentence that caused an uproar came from the mouth of expert Ma Chen.
And he has always held an "anti-China" view, if it weren't for Macron's visit to China to trigger changes in the EU's China policy, Machen would probably still stay in his own small world, publishing articles that are extremely respectful of the United States.
So, who is this person? Is it true that the chip research he is talking about cannot compete with the United States? Since the United States imposed ** sanctions on China, is it really China that has suffered the greatest loss?
Moreover, does China's military power really give the United States confidence?
China is now capitulating," a social media user named Ma Chen, who has changed his nickname several times and claimed to be an expert researcher. He made a series of statements in an attempt to get China to "surrender", and wrote a thousand-word essay for this purpose, detailing the benefits of "surrender".
Ma Chen's views caused strong opposition from netizens, a self-proclaimed expert and Chinese, but he belittled his homeland, tried to convince the public that "China can't work", and used this as an example to argue the Sino-US chip dispute.
Machen's anti-China rhetoric has become more and more intense after Macron's visit to China, and he even makes anti-China remarks every day, which he believes he is"Good words to persuade each other"。Although Ma Chen was full of confidence, his remarks were reported by netizens on the Internet, and there was no such person.
So, are the Chinese and American chips that Ma Chen said really as vulnerable as he said, and even Chinese chips cannot be compared in front of American chips? The answer is no.
If the United States really has confidence in China's chip research and development, why should it use various reasons"Captivity"What about Huawei President Meng Wanzhou? As one of the technology giants, Huawei has become a thorn in the side of the United States, so the argument that the research and development of Chinese chips is vulnerable in the face of the United States is untenable.
In the information age, chip competition has become an inevitable trend, therefore, the development of domestic chips and give them strong energy has become the core issue of the development of all countries. Chips are not only key electronic components, but also an important technology for leading the development of industries.
It can be said that the development of chips has become a core strategic asset of geopolitics between major powers. For China, which is developing day by day, the United States will naturally not ignore its attention to China's chip research and development.
The ambition of the United States lies not only in building its own empire around the world, but also in rebuilding its own chip industry in the field of technology.
The United States is promoting its international alliance policy through the chip industry, which is fully reflected in the "chip war" against China. Biden has made the semiconductor industry a key part of his infrastructure plan, increased R&D investment, and enacted the CHIPS and Science Act.
Its main goal is to develop the chip industry in the United States and use it as an excuse to establish alliances with countries that lack chips.
The United States is trying to establish a "chip quadripartite alliance" around China by increasing the chip industry chain in Taiwan, so as to contain the development of China's chip manufacturing industry.
The United States not only invested a lot of money to support South Korea's Samsung Group, but also used "chips" as a ** to prevent other countries from investing in Chinese mainland's chip manufacturing industry.
The U.S. has a clear goal of establishing a large-scale advanced logic chip manufacturing cluster with a complete ** chain and R&D center facilities by 2030.
In addition to Japan and South Korea, Southeast Asian countries such as Singapore and Malaysia have also joined the US camp. This makes the intentions of the United States even more obvious. The U.S. is using the "chip shortage" to woo these countries and prevent them from investing in China's tech industry.
This strategy of reversing China clearly tells China that it will not allow China's chip industry to have a chance to develop. So, why is the United States so afraid of Chinese chips?
Is it true that China's chip industry can't compete with it now? In fact, it is mainly Huawei's chips that have attracted international attention. As a Chinese tech company that previously relied heavily on imported materials, Huawei's rise caught the United States off guard.
Although Meng Wanzhou's imprisonment has become an abnormal suppression of China's scientific and technological development, coupled with the chip alliance created by the United States, China is facing many difficulties on the road to chip development.
The United States has used its advantages in the chip industry to induce other countries not to invest in Chinese technology companies, which has deprived China of the opportunity to communicate with external companies. Ni Guangnan, an academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering, said that in the field of chip manufacturing, countries such as the United States and Japan are indeed in the lead.
Just like before the Huawei incident, 80% of the equipment in China's chip manufacturing plants needed to be imported from abroad.
Although China has internationally renowned chip design and manufacturing industries such as Huawei HiSilicon and SMIC, it will take one or two decades to catch up with the international advanced level.
In addition, the United States is using the "lack of cores" as one of the anti-China means, and China's chip road has a long way to go. Therefore, China's market guidance has become one of the paths that China adheres to.
As for the market advantage of the United States, this does not apply in the ** war. Therefore, China does not need to despair, as Machen said.
This is one of the reasons why the United States has resisted the WTO in recent years. So, what is the reason?
The performance of the United States in the Sino-US war does not seem to fully accept the rules of the WTO. The principle of this organization is based on the comparative advantage of the market, that is, although the comprehensive national strength of each country is different, in the competition of the market, all countries stand on the same starting line.
While the U.S. has a certain advantage in terms of energy costs, it does not have a significant advantage in overseas markets. In order to promote its own development, the United States began to unilaterally resist WTO rules, artificially dividing the chain it needs to ensure its own interests.
China, because of its production-based economy, is seen by the United States as an adversary to challenge its consumer economic system. Coupled with geopolitics and demographic dividends, China has been hailed as the "factory of the world", which has aroused the jealousy of the United States.
In 2018, Trump launched a war against China, targeting industries such as machinery manufacturing, aerospace, and information and communications, and imposing high tariffs on Chinese goods.
A total of 13 rounds of Sino-US economic and trade consultations were held during the Trump era, but due to the emergence of the epidemic, the two sides temporarily stopped the war. On the surface, it seems to be calm, but the undercurrent is surging.
With the changes in the international situation, the United States is gradually losing its status as a world power, while China's world status, which is famous for its production strength, is skyrocketing. The United States has its own ideas about China, a large country in the East.
But the reality is that the losses in the Sino-US war are not only borne by China.
According to foreign media data, the Sino-US friction has caused varying degrees of losses to various industries in the United States. Technology, beer, automotive, and many other industries have been hit hard and in turmoil.
Especially in the field of science and technology, Huawei has been the first to be the best, and many technology companies in the United States are unable to give them the best parts, it seems that Huawei is under great pressure, but in fact, the pressure of American technology companies should not be underestimated, such as new Feitong Optoelectronics.
The U.S.** imposed a 10% tariff on aluminum imports to China, leading to a significant increase in transportation costs in the beer industry, prompting beer producers to reduce investment. Local farmers are the hardest hit by the friction, and despite the $20 billion provided by the United States, which eventually increased to $80 billion, it is difficult to solve the problem.
In general, the Sino-US friction has hurt the United States more obviously.
Although the United States is unwilling to let go of the dispute with China, after all, one of their motives for the war with China is precisely because they fear that China's development model will threaten it.
In this regard, expert Wei Jie said at the forum that the friction between China and the United States has not had a great impact on China's economy, but has prompted China to form a unique development model. The data also shows that in the period after the start of the Sino-US war, the decline in China's exports to the United States reached from September to December. 5% and 195%。
According to the latest data from China's Ministry of Commerce, the flow of direct investment from Chinese companies into the United States fell sharply, down 72%。In addition, economic data for the first two months of this year showed that China's exports to the United States had fallen to 715$7 billion, far less than China's exports to ASEAN or the EU.
The purpose of the U.S. tariff increase is to curb China's development in the United States, but the fact is that the United States' consistent suppression of China has led to a sharp decline in China's exports to the United States, and at the same time, it has also had a wide impact on various industries in the United States.
Although the United States has tried to hit China's development by raising tariffs, in reality, this approach will only hurt both sides.
First, China wants to surrender to the United States"This statement does not exist at all, and Ma Chen's remarks are untrue. The United States seriously underestimates China's development, and China has its own insistence and bottom line, both in terms of infrastructure and **.
China has its own unique strategy for dealing with the anti-China behavior of the United States. If the United States continues to impose tariffs and threaten China, China will not tolerate such egregious behavior.
China has a dividend market of 1.4 billion people, and although the United States is not interested, other countries are willing to participate. After all, the market has an irresistible appeal.
According to experts, China will adopt an open posture and welcome countries to establish friendly economic and diplomatic relations with China in order to counter the "isolationism" of the United States. At the same time, China will also reduce market access conditions and tariffs in order to introduce more high-quality foreign products, stimulate domestic production capacity, and promote the upgrading of China's industrial chain and the improvement of manufacturing capacity.
Building a new system of open economy has become an important task for China's development. In response to the U.S.'s tough behavior, China will maintain the principle of "well water does not interfere with river water", but if the U.S. goes too far, China will give a strong counterattack.
Medieval culture has always advocated global peace, so it has always adhered to a mutually beneficial and win-win foreign policy. However, if someone deliberately breaks the order and threatens China's long-term development, China will never back down.
China's military strength is not weaker than that of the United States, such as the Dongfeng missile series in 2019, or the so-called hypersonic ** developed by China instigated by the United States to instigate other countries.
If you consider these two items separately, you will find that it is not China that the United States needs to watch out for, let alone make China surrender to the United States. After all, the distance from China to the United States is about 14000 kilometers, and the launch of the DF-41 missile from China to the United States takes no more than 30 minutes.
In fact, it can strike accurately anywhere in the United States.
China has developed a hypersonic speed that makes it impossible for the outside world to search for specific information**, and once the system is activated, it can destroy any place on the planet in three hours.
But this is only a part of what the outside world knows about China**, and we cannot conclude from this information that China will lose in the Sino-US dispute. In fact, China has never been afraid of war, but it has always adhered to the concept of peaceful coexistence and avoided affecting the lives of its people.
However, if someone provokes again, China will respond with a posture that is not afraid to fight. Therefore, we must believe in the strength of the motherland and not be swayed by slander or rumors, otherwise we may become the "500,000" (a bonus issued by the state for reporting spies) that is considered by the people to be a monk.
This would be a serious loss.
How much does the United States think of China? With the threat of tariffs, the more countermeasures are increased, China: I will fight if you come.