Your concern will be my motivation, and your encouragement will be our motivation to move forward! Follow me and see my updates every day. Learn about the changing world of things.
The United States no longer seeks the position of military hegemony, but adopts a balanced strategy.
The United States, which is facing the rapid rise of China, realizes that it cannot maintain its position as military supremacy in the Asia-Pacific region. As a result, the United States is considering whether it should adopt a balanced approach to the effects of China's expansion. A balanced approach is seen as a more sustainable and less risky approach, appropriate to and harmonized with the unique geographical characteristics of the Asia-Pacific region.
In particular, the United States should focus on India, Japan, South Korea, and other important industrial hubs in the Asia-Pacific region to ensure that these regions are not swayed by China, so as to strengthen its defense capabilities and reduce its economic dependence on China. This is not only to maintain the leading role of the United States, but also to maintain stability and peace in the region.
In addition, the United States should also attach importance to its control of the Strait of Malacca, the South China Sea, the East China Sea and other important waters, and at the same time cooperate with India, Japan, the Philippines, Singapore and other countries. If these important points are grasped, the United States will be able to use its influence more effectively while also defending its own rights and interests. At the same time, this is a more practical goal that the United States can achieve at present.
Assist allies in strengthening their self-defense capabilities and share security responsibilities.
Rather than engage in a full-scale armed confrontation with China, the United States could instead help allies build up their own defenses and share their own security responsibilities. The United States, for example, has formed an all-round strategic partnership with Vietnam and signed new defense and co-manufacturing agreements with India. Such collaboration would ensure the security of allies and strengthen the U.S. voice in the Middle East.
However, it should be pointed out that the Biden administration still faces many difficult problems and challenges to build a new military alliance. Biden's administration has been slow to develop in Asia, lacking military access to key regions and insufficient allies and partners to support U.S. leadership. In addition, the establishment of close economic and trade ties with China is also the greatest interest of some countries, so they will also have reservations when it comes to military cooperation.
To this end, the United States can force allies and partners to abandon the purchase of expensive fighter jets and other equipment, and instead purchase lower and easy-to-move military equipment, such as drones, ships, ships, ships, ship missiles, and air defense. At the same time, the U.S. must make it clear to its allies that there is a limit to U.S. involvement, but it also needs to motivate allies to defend themselves.
Obstacles and prospects for equilibrium strategies.
But while balancing is seen as the only viable path for U.S. interests in Asia for decades to come, there are many obstacles to doing so. First, the way of thinking in the United States itself. The notion of U.S. military domination over Asia has long been deeply rooted in foreign and defense policy. The leaders of both political parties in the United States fear being left behind by Beijing in the arms race, so when China rises, the United States tends to be both competitive and antagonistic.
However, it is precisely because of this psychology that it has become the biggest obstacle to balanced development. In fact, China has never sought regional hegemony, so it is inadequate to use a balanced strategy to counter "Chinese hegemony". China has never tried to control any region that China does not control, not even India, Japan, or South Korea. So, the American view of "balance" is just an illusion.
In addition, the low level of military technology and the inability to reverse China's special position in Asia make it impossible for the United States to assist its neighbors in developing their military capabilities. China has no intention of invading its neighbors, so no matter how the United States develops its defense system, it will not pose any threat to China. In the long term, regional security issues can be achieved only through peaceful cooperation and open dialogue.
In short, the "balancing strategy" of Foreign Affairs is not aimed at China, but more of an "admission of mistakes" and "interpretation". China has never wanted to seek hegemony, and the direction of its international strategy will also be "independence" between countries. If the United States wants to truly maintain its position in the Asia-Pacific region, it must change its hegemonic mentality in the past, carry out more cooperation with China, and seek a safer, safer, and safer way to handle regional affairs, so as to achieve regional prosperity and development.
As long as you are here, you can get the freshest and freshest information, you can keep up with the times and grasp the development direction of fashion! I will remember every bit of you; I love everything you say.