On the third day of the first lunar month, the spirit of Ryoma is prosperous! Just as the whole country is jubilant and celebrating the New Year, Trump, the "king of understanding" on the other side of the ocean, also came with "good news", and he still told you in the way of self-exposure, so that everyone can see how the "king of understanding" handles this hot "love"! 
Let's take a look at where the "hi" comes from According to ** reports, former US ** Trump said at an election rally in South Carolina on February 10 that the conflict between Ukraine and Russia must be terminated and stressed that he does not support more aid abroad. "We have a responsibility to resolve this war involving Russia and Ukraine, and I will do my best to resolve it. During this period, Wang also stressed his doubts about "NATO", and revealed that he had told a head of state at a NATO summit that under his leadership, the United States would not protect any country that was "in arrears". "A big country's ** asked me, if we don't pay, but are attacked by Russia, will you protect us?" He replied, "You are in arrears?" Then I won't protect you. In fact, I would encourage them (Russia) to do whatever they want. So, you have to pay the bills! Trump's self-revealing remarks instantly made the nerves of people from all walks of life in the United States tense and couldn't hold it. Cohen, an analyst at Microsoft's NBC, said on social media that Trump's words sound like he is encouraging Russia to attack our NATO allies! American conservative current affairs commentator Alyssa Griffin believes that Trump's remarks are "as pleasant as **" to Putin's ears in Russia. White House spokesman Bates responded, "Encouraging Russia to invade our closest ally is a shocking ......."This jeopardizes America's global stability and domestic economy. ”
Trump: Surprised? Not surprised? NATO Member: Huh? Who the hell are you going to be with? For the Chinese New Year, don't look for it! If you want to say who is the best at being the best in the United States, it may not be easy to compare, after all, the level is not good. Then I want to ask which ** in the United States knows the most about business, and "understanding the king" must be on the list. It is worth noting that Trump's remarks and stance have existed a long time ago, and it is not a new topic, but it was exposed by him two days ago. Does it mean that if you don't pay for it, you will beat me? NATO members may be tempted to ask the king who understands, are you a "happy" thing? I know that you like Putin, and now you simply don't turn your back, you want to give us a funeral! It is said that Trump likes Putin for a day or two, and Wang has expressed his admiration for Putin many times in public, and even looks like Putin's "idol". For example, in April 2021, Trump said, "I get along well with Putin, I like him, he likes me, and that's a good thing......."So when Wang said that the conflict between Russia and Ukraine must be ended, Zelensky said for the first time that Trump's statement that he would resolve the conflict between Russia and Ukraine within 24 hours made him uneasy. This is good, it is the turn of NATO members to be uneasy, after all, it is very likely that Wang will be re-elected as the United States. In fact, these tricks of Trump began to be used several years ago! At the 2018 NATO summit, Trump threatened the leaders of NATO allies that if they did not pay 2% of GDP for military spending, the United States would withdraw from NATO. You must know that Trump is not joking, if you want to talk about which one is stronger in "withdrawing from the group", Blue Star has to look at the "understanding king". During Trump's previous term, the United States withdrew from the Paris Climate Agreement, the Iran Nuclear Agreement, the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, and a series of international organizations and agreements, including the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and the Human Rights Organization. Speaking of "NATO", as we all know, this is a military alliance led by the United States, which was originally established to fight against the former Soviet Union, and today's Russia-Ukraine conflict is also forced out by the continuous eastward expansion of "NATO". Although Trump said that he would withdraw from the group if he disagreed, if he really thought that he would withdraw from NATO, few people would believe it. Even Trump himself has publicly stated that the United States will continue to "strongly support" NATO. So the question is, one will say that he will not protect NATO allies, and the other will strongly support it, what does Trump want to play? One word "money"! 
Understand that Wang is a businessman, and his set of "America First" is, to put it bluntly, to let the United States make money first. According to Trump, all U.S. allies will have to increase military spending, because the U.S. will not provide "protection" to allies for free. Moreover, the United States has hundreds of military bases overseas, and these expenditures are also provided by the host countries. To be precise, the United States, the leading big brother, has to collect "protection money" on time, how much do the allies of the United States have to pay a year? According to some data for 2023, NATO (30 countries) paid $130 billion for the United States, Australia paid $3.5 billion, South Korea paid $10 billion, and Japan paid $19 billion for security protection. Regarding this phenomenon, Putin once pointed out that "there are only a few sovereign countries in the world." NATO, which seems to be very developed, has in fact always paid "protection money" to the United States, and on the surface they are allies, but they have almost no say. For the United States, charging high "protection fees" is only the beginning, not the end. 
According to reports, in order to cater to the United States, NATO member countries have set a strategy to gradually increase defense investment by 2024 to meet the US requirement of 2% of GDP. But can all NATO members meet this "standard"? The answer is "no"! According to Italian Defense Minister Crosetto in 2023, it is impossible for Italy to achieve the goal of increasing military spending to 2% of GDP in 2024, as required by NATO (in fact, the United States), and even by 2028 it will be difficult. Within NATO, there are not a few countries like Italy, and only 6 countries can meet the target in 2023, including the United States, the United Kingdom, and Poland. Therefore, Trump has always been very dissatisfied, and even threatened to withdraw from NATO, or engaged in blackmail. Understand that the king is looking at the ** in sight, if you don't do some "performance" to the voters at this time, when will you exert your strength? You don't want to pay the money, right, I moved Russia here, scared and scared you, usually treat me as a big brother, treat myself as a developed country, and pretend to be deaf and dumb as soon as I submit the money. Now I understand that Wang emphasized again, give me the money to make up, otherwise I will let Russia beat you! Let's talk about it, can Trump's old routine take care of those "allies" of NATO? According to Brother Youli, it's difficult! What's the difficulty? The first difficulty: no one has any surplus food to see that the conflict between Russia and Ukraine has been dry for almost two years, which European countries are not tightening their belts to aid Ukraine, the international economy is declining again, the United States is harvesting through Russia and Ukraine, and what is lost is not European meat, no one is rich, how can there be surplus grain to pay "protection money"?The second difficulty: the outdated "small circle" is declining "NATO" was established after World War II, is a product of the "Cold War", the simple military alliance is an outdated combination of the last century, after the Cold War, the mainstream of the world is peace, people are determined, big guys want to make money, who really wants to disturb the geopolitical situation with the United States everywhere, the key is that you eat meat in the United States, they can't drink soup. 
On the other hand, rabbits have made money over the years, and their friends have made a lot of money, and the small money makes them count until they are soft, who is not like Spiegel in their hearts. If you follow the United States to make a fool of yourself, it will be light to be beaten, and it may be the norm for families to be ruined and people will die. It seems that this money can't be paid, if it really doesn't work, understand the king or continue to withdraw from the group, anyway, it's not bad for this one!