Everyone should maintain basic qualities in public places, respecting the rights and feelings of others. However, in an incident at a movie theater in Daqing, Heilongjiang, a three-year-old child made a fuss in the movie theater, causing a series of shocking disputes. The conflict between the child's parents and other moviegoers even evolved into an incident of ** intervention. Who exactly is to blame for this incident? Are the parties acting reasonably? Let's go deep into the depths of justice and reason.
In this incident, a three-year-old child was unable to watch the movie quietly, and kept making noise in the movie theater, which seriously affected the experience of the moviegoers around him. Although some parents were reminded to use headphones or turn down the volume, the parents of the children did not effectively control the children's behavior, which led to the escalation of the dispute.
Expanding: The cinema is crowded, the lights flicker, and the images on the screen are thrilling, but all this is broken by a seemingly innocent child. The child mischievously broke free from the shackles of his parents, running back and forth, giggling, causing others to cast dissatisfied eyes. Although the child is a minor, his behavior is trained and guided by adults to a certain extent. In public places, parents still need guidance and regulation to develop good behavior habits.
When parents of children are accused by the moviegoers around them of influencing the viewing environment, they are angry at the blame of others, and even put the blame on others entirely. In the fierce confrontation, the attitude of the child's parents became more and more tough, demanding that others apologize to the child, and even caused a college student to kneel and admit his mistake after an emotional breakdown, and the incident escalated.
Expanding: The atmosphere of accusation and antagonism heats up quickly in the cinema, as if an invisible flame is burning between the two parties. The parents of the children are unwilling to take responsibility for the education and instead blame all the mistakes on the moviegoers around them. They refuse to accept criticism from others, behave as tough and stubborn, take mistakes as wrong, and turn a blind eye to their own children. And the moviegoers are also losing patience and questioning the inappropriate behavior of the children's parents, triggering a fierce emotional confrontation.
As the incident escalated, the child's parents not only demanded an apology on the spot, but also reported to the police that they would be held legally responsible. They said that their portrait rights and reputation rights had been violated, and they hoped to protect their rights and interests through legal means. However, after the ** of the incident was uploaded, the public's reactions were very different, and the opinions in the comment area were mixed, and they commented on the incident one after another.
Expanding: Parents of emotional children choose to solve the problem by calling the police, trying to fight for their rights and interests through legal means. In their view, the image of their family has been violated by others and they must act to defend their dignity. However, the law is not the only way to solve the problem, and in the case of incidents involving social public order and individual rights and interests, it is all the more necessary to be cautious in handling them to avoid further escalation. The conflict between the parties does not exist in isolation, but reflects people's common concern and appeal for order in public places.
Once the incident is on the Internet, the discussion is even more intense. In the comment section, parents and opponents of the child have their own opinions, and there are differences about the nature of the incident and how to deal with it. Some people believe that the behavior of college students on the Internet has constituted a certain degree of infringement, while others believe that calling the police is a reasonable means to express understanding of the attitude of the child's parents.
Expanding: The online world is the center of information dissemination, and once an event is **, it is like a stone thrown into a social pond, which has aroused countless ripples of thought. Differences of opinion and clash of values are like a debate in a virtual space. Some people support the persistence of parents to defend their rights, arguing that they should be held accountable for privacy violations; Others believe that parents are too extreme and should face the incident calmly and start to find a solution.
This dispute in the cinema not only involved the parents' education methods and social public order, but also triggered heated discussions on the Internet. In my view, education and public awareness should permeate all aspects of social life. Parents need to take responsibility for their children's education and cultivate their social literacy and public morality; On the other hand, citizens should also be aware of the need for mutual respect and understanding in public places. Only by working together can parents and society build a harmonious and stable social environment, so that every citizen can grow together with dignity and respect.