This is a controversial incident, so let's take a look at the cause and effect: Ms. Li lost a diamond ring worth 30,000 yuan. This diamond ring meant so much to Ms. Li that she was anxious to look for it.
Fortunately, through the surveillance video, she discovered a ridiculous fact - the diamond ring was picked up by a 3-year-old child.
The little boy who didn't know what was going on, after picking up the diamond ring, mistook it for candy and put it in his mouth to play.
When the child's parents found out about the incident, they quickly removed the diamond ring and threw it away for the child's safety (which was later not found). However, they didn't realize that this seemingly ordinary ring was actually real, and it was not cheap.
Ms. Li had mixed feelings after learning that the diamond ring had fallen. She is not only glad that she has been lost, but also distressed by the "loss" of the diamond ring. However, when she asked the child's parents for compensation of 30,000 yuan, the two sides had a disagreement.
Parents believe that they did not deliberately discard the ring, but did it unknowingly to protect their child. They expressed unacceptability with the amount of compensation proposed by Ms. Li and believed that they were not fully liable.
After mediation, the two parties finally reached a consensus. The child's parents are willing to bear part of the responsibility within 20,000 yuan to make up for part of Ms. Li's losses.
So, who is the biggest wrongdoer in this incident?
On the surface, Ms. Li seems to have become the "wronged leader" of this farce. She lost her diamond ring and ended up receiving only part of the compensation, which seems to have suffered a big loss.
However, if we think deeply, we will find that in fact, each character has a certain amount of responsibility and helplessness.
First of all, Ms. Li, as the owner, was negligent and led to the loss of the diamond ring. Despite her anxious search, that doesn't mean she's completely blameless. It was her carelessness that caused this chain of events.
Secondly, the child is innocent, he just picked up the diamond ring out of naïve curiosity. Although the parent's handling is out of the perspective of protecting the child, it has caused further losses of the diamond ring. They didn't realize the value of the diamond ring and hastily discarded it, but in the end, they were undoubtedly the one to blame.
inadvertent action, but in the end lost five figures, it is estimated that I will wake up crying when I sleep in a dream.
What do you think?