Mr. Chen argued with others, and then quarreled after eating, but there was no result, and the prime

Mondo Health Updated on 2024-02-01

In the years of the Anti-Japanese War, a fierce dispute between two outstanding generals, ** and Xiang Ying, revealed to us the complex ideological struggles and strategic choices within the Communist Party of China at that time.

At the end of 1938, a dialogue about "people, guns, and styleism" became the fuse for the collision of ideas between ** and Xiang Ying. **Insist on emphasizing the close relationship between "people, guns, and money", and believe that all are indispensable. This viewpoint is deeply rooted in the principle of independence and self-determination, and reflects the reality that war requires comprehensive support.

However, Xiang Ying was influenced by Wang Ming's idea of "Prime Minister's Memorial Week" and put forward a concept with the united front as the core. This idea originated from Xiang Ying's speech at the provincial party headquarters of the Kuomintang in Nanchang, which revealed his influence on the "Collection of Speeches on Wang Ming's War of Resistance". This kind of thinking has been criticized as "capitulationism" and has aroused strong antipathy.

* In the controversy, the essence of Xiang Ying's idea of "Prime Minister's Memorial Week" was revealed, and he accused it of being foreign and harmful. This controversy is not only a contest of ideas, but also an expression of the concern and responsibility of the two generals for the future of the country.

The intensity of the argument reached its peak during the meal, and the questioning of Xiang Ying made the atmosphere tense. However, Xiang Ying added his favorite fried chili pepper to the meal to express his kindness. This scene reflects the deep comradeship hidden beneath the sharp rhetoric between the two generals.

* Firm and outspoken in the controversy, his criticism of Xiang Ying was not motivated by personal malice, but by concern for the state war situation. This concern was later proved to be justified, because Xiang Ying's ideas were criticized after the Sixth Session of the Sixth National Congress of the Sixth Army, and the development strategy of the New Fourth Army was redetermined, consolidating to the south, fighting to the east, and developing to the north.

* The results of this controversy were detailed at the meeting of the Central China Bureau, emphasizing that this controversy has been proven in the development of history. This shows that Xiang Ying's persistence is standing on the correct historical stage, while Xiang Ying's thinking has exposed its flaws in practice.

The controversy was not confined to the two generals, it had far-reaching implications, touching on the ideological struggle within the Chinese Communist Party throughout the period of the Anti-Japanese War. In this process, the principle of independence and autonomy was reaffirmed as the correct strategic choice.

This history also reflects the tenacity and perseverance of the Communist Party of China in the face of difficulties, and in the face of the impact of foreign ideas, the party has been able to self-correct and find the right direction of development. This is not only a recognition of the concept of the Communist Party of China, but also a demonstration of the organizational ability and unity of the Communist Party of China.

In this ideological struggle, the dialogue between ** and Xiang Ying is not only a collision of ideas, but also a confrontation of responsibility and responsibility. By adhering to the principle of independence and self-determination, it defended its strategic decision-making and made great contributions to the victory of the Communist Party of China during the Anti-Japanese War.

In the end, this controversy has been clearly concluded in the long river of history, and the correctness of ** has been fully proven. The deeds of the ** marshal are described in detail in the book "Ten Marshals of the Chinese People's Liberation Army", emphasizing his correctness on the big political line and his tenacious personality.

This best-selling book is not only an affirmation of the first marshal, but also a review and summary of the history of the Communist Party of China. With more than one million copies sold, it topped the bestseller list of China's bestsellers, highlighting readers' keen interest in historical themes and their reverence for heroic generals.

To sum up, the controversy between ** and Xiang Ying is not only a contest between the ideas of the two generals, but also a microcosm of the ideological struggle within the Communist Party of China in a special historical period. This period of history has witnessed the victory of correct thinking, and also demonstrated the persistence and wisdom of the Communist Party of China in the difficult situation. We should draw lessons from this period of history, cherish the correct strategic decisions, and at the same time maintain reverence for history, never forget our original aspirations, and forge ahead.

Related Pages