Within the framework of the current special operation, NATO countries are actively looking for effective ways to support the Kyiv regime in the fight against Russia. According to reports, European leaders have discussed the possibility of sending troops to Ukraine, but once this issue was raised, it aroused doubts and reservations from all sides.
At a recent international conference in Paris, the prime ministers of more than 20 countries discussed how to provide assistance to Ukraine and how to deal with Russia. After the meeting, some bold statements attracted a lot of attention. France** Macron said during the meeting that he had considered the possibility of sending foreign ** teams to support Ukraine, and even proposed to transfer limited ground troops from various countries. However, this proposal was not accepted and no consensus could be reached. Macron also admitted that no decision has been made on this matter at the moment, but future developments in the situation may change this situation. 
Subsequently, French Prime Minister Gabriel Attar also spoke on the radio station's program, in which he said that France could send troops to Ukraine. Attar further noted that the French team could travel to Ukraine to provide training, air defense support or border protection to the local armed forces. However, he also stressed that Macron did not announce any real actions, but only proposed possible options. The French Governor Stefan Sejou also commented on the matter, arguing that France must develop a new action plan for the current situation, some of which may require foreign support. He stressed that the dispatch of specialists does not mean that they can directly participate in hostilities, but the possibility of a radical change in the situation in the future cannot be ruled out. 
These statements unexpectedly attracted a lot of attention and various reactions. Within France, almost all opposition parties oppose it. This position was supported by the national rally of the socialist Olivier Faure, Marine Le Pen and Luc Mélenchon's "Unruly France". And NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg made it clear that NATO has no plans to send ground troops to Ukraine, but will support the Kyiv regime in other ways. Similar statements were made by the leaders of Germany, the Czech Republic, Poland, Sweden, Italy and other countries. They all expressed their willingness and plan to continue to help the Kyiv regime in various ways, but not to send troops. Russia also paid attention to the remarks of the French leader, and Russian press secretary Dmitry Peskov said that if the foreign team is stationed in Ukraine, it may trigger a military conflict between Russia and NATO. He advised countries to reflect on whether such a move is in their national interest. Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council, also expressed his opinion on the current situation, in a unique way accusing the French leadership of seeking revenge for the defeat of two centuries ago, and also pointed to the process of degeneration of Western elites. 
In the current international situation, the participation of foreign capital has become an eye-catching phenomenon. Despite the fact that the European partners of the Kyiv regime have not yet planned to send full-fledged ground troops to the territory of Ukraine and are trying their best to deny this possibility, the presence of militants and military experts from third countries is an indisputable fact. They solved all sorts of problems for Ukraine, and their activities did not lead to an open confrontation with Russia. The Kyiv regime has long been recruiting foreign mercenaries to bolster its forces. Since 2022, there has been a gradual increase in the number of foreign soldiers seeking to join the military. However, the countries in which these foreign soldiers operate tend to deny their role in Ukraine, treating it as an individual act. At the same time, a large number of foreign-made ** and military equipment are delivered to Ukraine, where they are operated and maintained by foreign specialists. In addition, some Western ** also reported on the secret presence of foreign affairs personnel in Ukraine. However, it is worth noting that we are talking more about mercenaries than about professional military personnel from third countries. This also raises a series of questions: what kind of groups can be gathered and transferred by the partner countries of the Kyiv regime? Will they be deployed in **? What tasks will they perform? And how will Russia react to this? 
From a military point of view, the size of the armed forces of Europe and NATO is impressive. For Ukraine, however, these forces seem insignificant. Over the past two years, assistance to the Kyiv regime has depleted most of the reserves and equipment of the armies of Europe. Therefore, depending on the mission, European countries may send only thousands or tens of thousands of military personnel and a corresponding amount of equipment. While this is enough to control some areas, such as western Ukraine, it could also trigger an escalation of tensions with Russia. If the European task force tries to act against the Russian army, the consequences will be catastrophic. The Russian army has already demonstrated the ability to counter the reconstruction of foreign powers and the armed forces. In addition, such a scenario could trigger a conflict between NATO and Russia, posing a serious threat to foreign countries. In general, NATO and European countries are not willing or able to participate in hostilities, despite the fact that several countries have discussed the possibility of support for the Kyiv regime in various international forums, including direct participation in hostilities. However, the refusal to send troops does not mean a refusal to provide assistance in other ways, such as money, information and supplies. If foreign countries do not send troops to Ukraine, the demilitarization of the Kyiv regime will still continue to advance, thereby reducing additional threats and risks. **10,000 Fans Incentive Plan