Lao Hu Pandao was stunned! "Killing the rich and helping the poor is wrong! began to sell crazy. Let's talk about his advertising slogan first.
But but but but but what about but? Paying attention to Lao Hu Pandao indirectly was unexpected.
Originally, it was nothing, but in this issue, he dressed himself up as a grease mouth, and everything can be done, but the indirect accident can still be absolutely correct and 99% correct?
Judging from the title and important matters, it is not only unwise, but also dizzy. Iron mouth and steel teeth are determined to envy, envy and hate the rich, kill the rich and help the poor, and have the ability to make a lot of money within the scope of the law.
From a normal point of view, his family has been stimulated, right? When it comes to class struggle, it means wearing a high hat and parading the streets, and seriously treating Hu Hansan as an ancestor.
Misnomer. Kill the rich and help the poor? Which rich man is killed in today's society? Is "killing" the rich really helping the poor? This is where he flashes his words, and he also claims to be 99% correct and analyzes them in detail! Envy and hatred of the rich, ** come?
Now those who want to engage in class struggle, who think that there is any oppression and exploitation in society, is not the reason at all. So what is the reason? It is because of these people that he sees that others are rich, but he himself is not rich, and he envies and hates the rich. He wants to fight the local tyrants again, divide the land, and he wants to kill the rich and help the poor.
Isn't this the landlord of the rich? It is completely unrealistic, to say that there are new rich people can, but the landlords have not reappeared.
It is said that in a society governed by the rule of law and within the scope of the law, it is impossible to distinguish between legal acts and non-legal acts, customary acts and moral acts. There are still many people who think this way, and some people say that China should learn from foreign countries and take law as the first principle of human beings, rather than morality as the first principle. However, he forgot that the European and American legal systems had customary law and that China did not recognize customary law. Therefore, Hu Xijin recently advocated once again that the law allows it if it is not prohibited.
This is the little metaphysics of the flim and the iron mouth, grinding things that may not exist, and even saying that it is wrong to determine things that do not exist - * Kill the rich and help the poor! It is purely alarmist and misleading.
A society governed by the rule of law and the rule of law in China are undoubtedly the general direction, and scientific legislation, strict law enforcement, fair justice, and law-abiding by the whole people are no longer things that are allowed and not allowed by law. If there is no prohibition in the law, it means that there is no law, and there is no law and there is a policy; With the policy, some people take advantage of the policy loopholes.
However, it is not necessarily unsubstantiated to bring those who take advantage of policy loopholes to justice. When it comes to socialist morality, it does not have a specific point to "Chinese revolutionary morality." Don't talk about revolutionary morality, only govern society, kill the rich and help the poor, but slapping the mouth often happens, such as Hebei and Guizhou.
In short, the iron mouth of the grease nozzle is like a willful genius who sells crazy, and the iron nozzle of the oil nozzle has no beauty to rely on, and it is known as peeling off the cocoon, but it is actually a judgment out of thin air, and the flamboyant tongue. The cocooned mouth can't tell whether it's saliva or excrement. The issue of peasants' pensions is the right of NPC deputies and CPPCC members, while right and wrong, right and wrong are small pondering and small metaphysical acts without authority.