In the Liupanshui incident in Guizhou, ** was almost one-sided on the side of the arrested female entrepreneurs. Is it okay for you to stand in line in such a hurry?Imagine that just a year ago, in the Hu Xinyu incident, how many people were coerced by the Internet, attacked the school in one go, and blamed the local ***. But what about the result?With the discovery of Hu Xinyu's body, the fact of suicide was revealed. The family of Hu Xinyu, who was crying and making trouble, received a lot of compensation, and the online promoters who waved their flags and shouted reaped wave after wave of traffic, and even some lawyers who fanned the flames became famous in the incident and became well-known lawyers. But what about the majority of netizens?In retrospect, do you feel like you've been fooled?
Regarding the arrest of the female entrepreneur in Liupanshui, we might as well think about it calmly. First, to undertake a project of hundreds of millions of yuan, such an enterprise is by no means an ordinary enterprise, such an entrepreneur is by no means an ordinary entrepreneurThe strength of such an entrepreneur must be more than 9999% of netizens believe that she will have the ability to protect her own rights and interests. That.
Second, say ** arrears 2200 million, is there any evidence?Audited?Is the settlement settled?Since it is**owe 2.If the huge amount of 200 million is not returned, will you be sued?Why not apply for enforcement?**'s money is also the country's money, but also the people's money, to give there must be a basis, not to give a reason. That.
Third, it is said that the local government will use 12 million yuan to resolve the 2200 million, is there any evidence?Until now, it has been a one-sided rhetoric. How stupid do local ** have to be to make such a coercive deal?In the end, the female entrepreneur was caught, is there a problem with the catch?Although the crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles has been widely criticized, it has not been abolished after all, and it is still a crime explicitly stipulated in the Criminal Law. Since there is this crime, there must be someone suspected of committing a crime, and the key is whether the evidence for filing a case is sufficient, just like the official report, whether the facts such as pressing the tracking device on someone else's car, illegally obtaining other people's information, and maliciously hyping on the Internet exist and whether they meet the standards for filing a criminal case. If the criteria for filing a case are met, whether it is an entrepreneur, a female entrepreneur, or an ethnic minority female entrepreneur, they should be treated equally before the law like ordinary people.
This is not such a complicated event, and I believe it will not be too long before it will come to light. We can wait! What do you say?