The famous scholar Guo Songmin interpreted "The Three-Body Problem" in a unique way, he found fault with each one and read it with a critical eye, and the process was full of fun and struggle.
The Three-Body Problem is a science fiction masterpiece that contains many interesting and imaginative physics settings, some possible, some impossible; There are also subversive sociological, philosophical views and inferences.
These can be topics of discussion, whether they are possible or impossible, and they cannot affect the charm of "The Three-Body Problem". However, Guo Songmin's special vision allows him to see things that others can't see from "The Three-Body Problem", and he even interprets this sci-fi book as a "big poisonous weed".
A recognized hard science fiction ** can also be compared with scar literature, and I admire Guo Songmin's unique way of interpreting it.
Guo Songmin emphasized that the review does not have to wait until the whole book is read. However, it would be unscrupulous to make a comment out of context based on a one-sided fragment.
Reviews need to be based on understanding and mastery of the entire book, so that they can achieve accurate and in-depth analysis and evaluation. Therefore, he encourages readers to read the book as completely as possible before reviewing it, and to connect the plot before and after it to ensure the accuracy and fairness of the review.
It has been proven that casual comments on a book without an in-depth understanding often lead to misunderstandings and ridicule. Let's illustrate this with a few examples. In The Three-Body Problem, the key figures Ye Wenjie and Evans both have experiences in China, yet commentator Guo Songmin simply believes that the author is deliberately leading readers to hate China.
Guo Songmin believes that the "force outside of human beings" in "The Three-Body Problem" is God, and Ye Wenjie hopes that extraterrestrial civilizations will save mankind. However, Evans is disillusioned with humanity as a whole because of their destruction of the environment, and decides to meet the Trisolarans for destroying the planet.
In fact, in the original book, through the mouth of Ye Wenjie, the condemnation of Evans's ideas did not make him the only saint. Guo Songmin, on the other hand, stiffly linked the illustration of Ye Wenjie being guarded by the Red Guards with the scene of the Jews being escorted to the concentration camp, which made people feel very uncomfortable.
In general, the "extra-human forces" in ** are not alien civilizations, but refer to Evans, who is disappointed in humanity and chooses to meet the Trisolarans for the destruction of the earth.
Guo Songmin strongly criticized Zhang Beihai's behavior in **, and even compared him to the Japanese Young Zhuang faction officers in the thirties, which shows his neo-dogmatic tendencies.
However, we should understand that Zhang Beihai's decision was made for the sake of the future of all mankind, and he had to kill people on the space station to create some illusions. Although Guo Songmin has different views on this kind of behavior, we should respect everyone's choices and decisions.
The "cosmic sociological axioms" of The Three-Body Problem reveal the contradiction between the survival and expansion of civilization, but it does not imply the rationality of Nazism. Guo Songmin's interpretation is too subjective and lacks the support of the original work.
The Three-Body Problem depicts a dark battle, but it does not justify Nazism. Instead of imposing their own values on the characters and events in the work, people should understand and appreciate the work rationally.
Guo Songmin expressed dissatisfaction with the setting of "The Three-Body Problem" during the Cultural Revolution, and he believes that this work is not only a scar sci-fi, but also a dark sci-fi. His remarks shocked and disappointed, and through his extreme and narrow interpretation, he characterized "The Three-Body Problem" as a pseudo-science fiction that slanders the great motherland and attacks Marxism-Leninism.
He seems to think that the whole ** is stigmatizing the Chinese.
In "The Three-Body Problem", there are many characters with very different personalities, and each character has their own values and ways of behaving. Someone singles out a character for psychological and behavioral analysis, and then attacks violently, as if they are good at buttoning their hats from any angle.
This technique is exactly the same as that of Yao Stick back then, and it is blue. These people think that Liu Cixin is carrying private goods in the book, but in fact, they themselves have a lot of private goods. They use the Cultural Revolution mentality that has not changed for decades to hold the so-called"Historical materialism"The big ruler, painstakingly guessing the so-called riddles behind the words, digging out the author's so-called subtle words, and happily acting as a modern version"***"Enthusiast.
I believe that Guo Songmin at this moment must be shouting loudly: using science fiction to oppose the party is a great invention! Some readers were not used to seeing him out of context, so he refuted it under Guo Songmin's headline.
Guo Songmin buckled them"Catholic position"means that the people he opposes are all Christians, who only worship and have no critical thinking. There was before"Concubinageism", after that"Catholic position"These two hats are really impressive.
Although Guo Songmin tried to make his point by far-fetched, most netizens did not accept this unreasonable statement.
Ever since he provoked Hu Xijin's dispute, he has found that he is keen on sowing discord, addicted to infighting, and lacks etiquette or standards. Words such as "concubineism" and "grass on the wall" are really unbearable for ordinary people to buckle big hats on people's heads at every turn.
Hat wholesalers throw hats all over the place, and what else can survive? Guo Songmin's criticism believes that it is time for Da Liu to enter the cowshed. Even reading the book "The Three-Body Problem" can find the class struggle, and the methods of the old left have really been the same for decades.
If this kind of atmosphere continues to spread, the controversy on the Internet will not stop, the country will not be peaceful, and there will be endless disasters left behind. If Guo Songmin and his pheasant organization, Kunlun Ce, still have a shred of conscience, please don't use their prejudices to guide other readers.
If a person looks at everything like a "big poisonous weed", then he is likely to be a "big poisonous weed" himself.