February** Dynamic Incentive Program
"Post-truth" is often used to describe a distorted ecology in which emotionalization and personal values are more influential in shaping public opinion than objective facts. The public freely expresses their opinions on the Internet, and shapes the orientation through the platform. However, in this hustle and bustle, the truth is often covered up, undermining the fairness and justice of the judiciary, weakening the authority of the judiciary, and disrupting the balance between ethics and law. In the post-truth era, the main responsibility should be borne when reporting news events, and it is the responsibility to cultivate the professionalism of journalists, improve the literacy and awareness of the public, formulate rules to ensure the ethical use of technology, return to the journalistic value orientation, and strictly abide by the code of professional ethics.
In a trial, the public and the courts each play different roles. The relative independence of the courts should be at the heart of judicial adjudication, but news coverage can also have an impact on the courts' adjudication. Deemed to be"Overseers"with"Social watchman"These roles continue to strengthen the power of journalism, making it more than its own responsibilities within the scope of the law. However, when the role is misplaced, it is no longer the guide, but played"Referees"Arbitrarily commenting, drawing conclusions, or even directly pronouncing judgments on cases will be unfair to the defendant, damage his reputation and image, and seriously threaten the fairness and independence of judicial trials.
In"Post-truth"In the times, the news landscape is undergoing profound changes. Traditional forms such as television and radio maintain a certain authority due to the formality of their messages and their rigorous screening procedures, however, the rise of new forms such as social and self-media is changing the rules of information dissemination. Everyone can be a disseminator of information, which expands the channels for information dissemination, but also brings the spread of disinformation and one-sided opinions. In addition, emerging ** is better at attracting public attention, while official ** may not be good at eliciting emotional resonance. As a result, the advantages of official discourse have been gradually challenged, and important changes have taken place in the field, which require more flexible and innovative ways to adapt to this change to ensure the credibility and value of information dissemination.
As the traditional ** also tends to be market-oriented, new business models are constantly being explored to achieve monetization, but some journalists have resorted to unethical means, such as creating exaggerated headlines, spreading fake news and hype, in order to attract the attention of the audience and obtain traffic and economic benefits. This competition has intensified the competition among the traditional mainstreams, leading them to scramble to cover sensitive social events that attract public attention, giving top priority to stories that appeal to audiences. For example, in the case of Jiang Ge's case, when the facts of the case were not clear and the conclusion was not clear, some ** published reports with guidance and tendencies, which went beyond the judicial procedure, made judgments on the defendant in advance, misled the public's perception, and eventually led to the formation of news **, which seriously damaged judicial fairness.
It is the duty and obligation to exercise the right of supervision within a reasonable range, and once the power is alienated and the bottom line of supervision is breached, it will have a negative impact on society. The role of ** has an important position in the society, which is not only the conveyor of news facts, but also the reflector of social conditions and public opinion and the guide of news**. In the name of reflecting public opinion, some self-leading people comment and report on cases at will, leading to unreasonable interference inside and outside the courtroom, leading the public to deviate from correct judgments, and then leading to the spread of irrational voices on the Internet. The judiciary may choose for reasons such as difficulty in going against the will of the people"Compromise"Pushing the trial of cases in a direction that conforms to the wishes of the public is obviously a manifestation of the alienation of media power, breaking through the bottom line of supervision and seriously harming judicial fairness.
Some networks** are driven by capital and have become tools for grabbing profits and spreading bad ideas. The rapid development of network technology has made the dissemination of information faster and more diverse, and the network** has become more complex and difficult to control. Under the influence of traffic and monetary interests, some people have not only lost their awareness of industry ethics and bottom line, but also used various means, such as entertaining reports, clearly directed speculations, tailored expressions and exaggerated reports, to incite negative emotions and mislead the public, and strengthen the influence of bad information dissemination. In addition, the use of new technologies has also made these more difficult to regulate and contain, exacerbating the difficulty of network control. Therefore, measures need to be taken to address this issue to ensure the health and fairness of the web**.
Information cocoons trap netizens in information bubbles, making it increasingly difficult for them to access diverse perspectives and information. Ordinary people are susceptible to personal emotions and values, looking for information that is consistent with their own opinions, and algorithmic technology continues to reinforce this trend, leading to the formation of information cocoons. People also tend to look for social circles similar to their own, further cementing their thinking patterns and cognitive biases. This phenomenon restricts people's ability to obtain information and think, making it more and more difficult for them to understand and accept different points of view, which ultimately leads to the extremes of thinking and the solidification of cognition. Therefore, attention should be paid to the issue of information cocoons, and people should be encouraged to cross information boundaries and seek diverse perspectives and information** in order to promote a more open and pluralistic environment**.
In"Post-truth"In the era, anyone can become a disseminator of information, and the content of information is easy to be tampered with and reconstructed, resulting in the frequent spread of false information. At the same time, emotions often overshadow rationality and become the main psychological characteristic of netizens when transmitting and receiving information. Driven by capital and technology, negative ** is more likely to arise and continue to spread. Therefore, great attention needs to be paid to it"Post-truth"The new problems and challenges faced by the guidance of the times, bravely face negative remarks, actively respond to the public's confusion and concerns, constantly innovate technical means, and actively govern the sources of negativity, so as to improve the quality and efficiency of the network guidance.