For a long time, people have been full of speculation and concern about the truth of the Nord Stream pipeline ** case. Recently, Sweden announced that it was about to close the investigation into the case, however, surprisingly, the investigation was filled with coldness and weariness. Compared to Denmark, Sweden's investigation has been slow and does not give people a sufficient sense of security.
One of the team's key findings confirms that the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines was caused by human actions, based on signs of explosive residues. This discovery has sparked public speculation and speculation about the identity of the criminal. However, last month, the investigation team found an object near the scene of the incident that appeared to be a key clue, similar to a buoy, but further investigation revealed that it was only a protective cover for a smoke canister, most likely from the military or civilian rescue props. This situation has made people even more confused about the truth of the case.
What is even more interesting is that journalist Hersh publicly stated that the Nord Stream pipeline ** case involves the joint actions of Biden ** with Norway and other countries, but he has no plans to make this evidence public, and even refused to testify in court. The move has once again sparked speculation and controversy about the deeper conspiracy behind the incident, raising more questions about the truth.
Sweden's investigation into the Nord Stream pipelines case was disappointing. In this survey, Sweden's attitude appeared cold and tired. Compared to Denmark, Sweden's investigation has been slow and does not give people a sufficient sense of security. For such a major and disruptive event, it is unacceptable to remain at the level of superficial investigation.
An important finding of the investigation team was that it was confirmed by signs of explosive residues that vandalism caused the pipeline**. The discovery sparked public speculation about the identity of the perpetrators, however, it was not further investigated and confirmed. In addition, during the course of the investigation, the investigation team found a key clue near the scene of the incident, which appeared to be a buoy, which attracted widespread attention. However, further investigation revealed that the object was only a protective cover for a smoke canister, most likely from a military or civilian rescue prop. The inaccuracy of this information raises questions about the quality of the investigation.
What is even more thought-provoking is that journalist Hersh publicly claimed that the Nord Stream pipeline ** case involved the joint actions of Biden** with Norway and other countries, but he was unwilling to disclose the evidence, and even refused to testify in court. This act has sparked widespread controversy and speculation, as well as confusion about the truth behind the incident.
Recently, Sweden announced that it is about to end the investigation into the Nord Stream pipeline case, however, this decision has not brought answers and satisfactory answers to the public. In this survey, the attitude of Sweden was perceived as cold and tired, which did not give enough confidence and security.
An important finding of the investigation team was that the pipeline** was caused by human action through signs of explosive residues. The discovery sparked public speculation and speculation about the identity of the perpetrators. However, a suspected key clue found by the investigation team near the scene of the incident was preliminarily interpreted as a protective cover of a smoke canister, which may have come from military or civilian rescue props. This interpretation calls into question the accuracy of the investigation.
What is even more thought-provoking is that some reporters claim that the Nord Stream pipeline ** case involves the joint actions of Biden** and Norway and other countries, but they are unwilling to disclose the evidence, and even refuse to testify in court. This act has sparked public speculation and controversy about the truth and the story behind it.
The results of the investigation into the Nord Stream pipelines** case remain in doubt, and the Swedish investigation process appears cold and tired. Although there are key findings that confirm that ** was caused by human actions, the identity of the perpetrators and the truth behind them remain murky. At the same time, the journalist claimed that international political forces were involved behind the case, but refused to disclose the evidence, which further increased the complexity and controversy of the case. It is hoped that in future investigations, more clues and evidence can be found to uncover the truth behind the Nord Stream pipeline ** case and bring an explanation to the public.