Dahan public opinion is painful and happy! After the movie Article 20 elegant and vulgar empathy

Mondo Culture Updated on 2024-03-05

In recent years, judicial injustice has continued to arouse hot public opinion, and surging public opinion has formed a "first-class trial" with greater impact. While enacting laws is important, enforcing them is the last line of defense to safeguard fairness and justice. The Spring Festival movie "Article 20" just fits the social pain points and the people's empathy points.

The film "Article 20" tells a story about legitimate defense, in which the male protagonist defends himself and his family when he is hunted down by the underworld, and finally reveals the truth.

After the movie was released, it attracted great attention and heated discussions on social **. Many netizens have expressed their worries and dissatisfaction with the judicial injustice in real life, believing that the plot in the film coincides with the injustice in reality, which has aroused the resonance and empathy of netizens.

There are two cases of the prototype of Article 20, one is the "Kunshan Anti-Homicide Case" and the other is the "Mother Humiliation and Homicide Case". These two cases caused a huge storm at that time, promoted the process of revising laws related to legitimate defense, and highlighted the positive effect of public opinion on judicial justice and social development.

Miscarriage of justice has always been one of the focal points of social attention, and this film draws public attention to the phenomenon of miscarriage of justice by telling a story about justifiable defense. People's attention to judicial fairness and the right to legitimate defense has been further enhanced, and the call for judicial reform and the improvement of judicial mechanisms has also become stronger.

The movie "Article 20" arouses the public's attention and thinking about judicial injustice by telling a story about legitimate defense. It reminds people to pay attention to the pain points of society and calls for the improvement of judicial mechanisms to protect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens. The appearance of this film aroused the public's enthusiasm for judicial fairness and promoted the society's thinking and action on judicial reform.

Interrogative Question: Can the Problem of Miscarriage of Justice Be Fundamentally Resolved? Can the film "Article 20" attract the attention of relevant departments and promote reform? How do we protect citizens' right to legitimate self-defense? These issues require further in-depth thinking and action. Only through unremitting efforts can social justice and justice be achieved, so that everyone can be protected in a level playing field.

Related Pages