In the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict entering its third year, both Ukraine and Russia have been seriously dragged into this war. In order to achieve the goal of weakening Russia, the West is also trying to renew Ukraine's life, so that the Ukrainian army can continue to consume Russia.
Recently, the news of NATO's dispatch of troops to Ukraine has spread all over the country. Russia also made a tough response to this, especially Putin's high-profile exaggeration of the power of his own nuclear ** in his State of the Union address, which left a deep impression on the global live broadcast. This move has undoubtedly made the United States and other Western countries feel mixed.
In his speech, Putin claimed that Russia currently has a number of nuclear weapons that even the United States does not have. Since the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, NATO has been brewing countermeasures, but has not dared to directly enter Ukraine to fight. The main reason for this is the deterrent effect of Russia's strong military power. If it were not for this, the United States and other NATO members would have already launched military operations across Ukraine's borders.
In the current tense situation, Russia is constantly asserting its military prowess and sending a clear signal to the West through Putin's statements. This protest not only puts pressure on NATO, but also warns NATO not to act rashly.
It is reported that Putin personally took the live launch of the "Avangard" missile, and at the same time, the current "Sarmat" missile of the Russian army has also entered a state of combat duty. On the question of whether Russia dares to use nuclear **, Russia is not just fighting a war of words, everything is possible according to the style of a fighting nation. Is it just that the United States and other Western countries dare to gamble with their own national fortunes?
If Russia loses on the battlefield in Ukraine, then disintegration is not far away, and it is more about the face of a permanent member of the UN Security Council. Of course, if the current strength of Ukraine alone is not enough to make the Russian army retreat. Unless, NATO comes to the aid of more lethal **, or the NATO army personally intervenes in the fight against Ukraine. If the situation does come to this point, believe that Russia may really use nuclear **. After all, Putin once said that if the world is not even Russia, then what else is the world going to do.
The United States provoked disputes in the Middle East, and now it is fanning the flames in the conflict in Ukraine, which is nothing more than that the flames of war cannot burn to its own territory, so it will sit back and relax. But Russia is a formidable adversary with the ability to attack the U.S. homeland. At the moment, the Russian "Poseidon" has completed the test and is about to be deployed in real combat. At the same time, Russia's "Petrel" nuclear-powered cruise missile has also taken the most critical step, which will pose a huge threat to the US mainland.
These Russian nuclear ** can hit the US mainland, and this alone can make the United States restless. But what worries the United States the most is that the United States does not have a foolproof plan to defend against these nuclear weapons of Russia.
The focus of the United States' defense on ballistic missiles is mainly focused on defending against high altitude and high orbit. But Russia's Poseidon is an underwater nuclear missile, and it is almost impossible for the United States to intercept it. And the most important thing in Russia is the "Haiyan" nuclear-powered cruise missile, which can achieve ultra-low-altitude flight and is difficult to detect. Due to its high endurance, it is able to move freely around the perimeter of the target area without launching an attack. Once it receives an attack order, it can immediately strike at the target, and the "Haiyan" nuclear-powered cruise missile can be described as a ghost, so what can the United States use to defend itself?
At the same time, Russia also has very prominent hypersonic missiles such as "Zircon" and "Dagger". And these two missiles have proven their strength on the battlefield, and Russia has quietly experimented with nuclear ** delivery vehicles. Now in the face of Ukraine, only conventional ammunition is used, but in the face of the threat from the United States-led NATO, it may switch the warhead to a nuclear bomb.
Before the Russian army entered the territory of Ukraine to carry out a special military operation, it must have deduced various results and risks, including the situation of NATO's next operation.
It's just that Putin has already issued a warning that the scope of Russia's ** attack covers the entire West. And Russia's tactical nuclear missiles are on combat duty, and 600 nuclear bombs can attack at any time.
In this case, which NATO country would dare to enter the war?