On the morning of February 28, several relevant personnel holding banners appeared at the entrance of Lei's SASS China headquarters, causing the surrounding crowd to stop and watch. Judging from the content of the banner, the spearhead was directly aimed at a serving executive surnamed Li in Sass China, and listed a number of accusations to report that the executive surnamed Li may be suspected of serious job violations, including using his position to approve the construction of stores, arranging bid-rigging to designate candidate companies, etc.
In addition, the whistleblower claimed that the content of the report was all from the report of Japan** and was not made up by him. The content of the report also indicates that the executive surnamed Li was a public employee of a state-owned enterprise, and it is not known whether the accusation is related to his previous work experience. If the relevant content of the report is true, the executive surnamed Li and his company may attract the attention of the relevant supervisory authorities.
Toyota and Lei have not yet made a clear response to the incident. According to Japan** reports, Li Hui, executive deputy general manager of Lei Sass China, took advantage of his position to help relatives and friends open car dealerships, and obtained benefits by designating advertising and marketing companies. In addition, Li Hui was also accused of having a large amount of income** unknown.
In this context, Lei's response to the report is particularly important. Only by facing up to the problem and strictly investigating corruption can Lei Mouss rebuild its brand image in the Chinese market and regain the trust of consumers.
Against this background, all sectors of society have expressed their views on this incident. Some people believe that if the content of the report is true, then this kind of corrupt behavior has seriously damaged the interests of enterprises and the state, and should be seriously dealt with in accordance with the law. On the other hand, there are also people who believe that the content of the report should not be easily believed until the matter is conclusively proven, so as not to cause unnecessary harm to the parties.
In addition, this incident has once again aroused the attention of the society to the fight against corruption and clean government. Many people said that the anti-corruption struggle has a long way to go, and it is necessary not only to intensify the crackdown on corrupt acts, but also to strengthen the building of systems to prevent the occurrence of corrupt phenomena. At the same time, enterprises should also strengthen their internal management, standardize their business behavior, and earnestly safeguard the interests of the state and the people.
In short, this incident has fully exposed the problems existing in the operation and management of some enterprises, and also reflects the strong demand of Chinese society for fighting corruption and advocating clean government. In the future development, we expect the company to establish a good moral style, strengthen internal supervision, and contribute to the sustainable development of China's economy. At the same time, it is also hoped that the relevant departments can attach great importance to such reports, earnestly perform their duties, and maintain social fairness and justice.
*People** client.
article/rmh40116219/rmh40116219