Start today's Russian-Ukrainian (Kazakh-Israeli) war topic:
Behind the Russian-Ukrainian frontal war, it is accompanied by a fierce intelligence war.
Many people think that the intelligence work of the United States, Britain and other countries is very powerful, but in fact, the intelligence work of Russia is also very good.
No, several high-ranking German military officers discussed the matter of blowing up the Crimean bridge, and they were poked out by the Russian **.
On March 1, Simonyan, editor-in-chief of Russia Today TV, released an audio recording in which Bundeswehr officers discussed sensitive information such as whether the Taurus cruise missile could technically destroy the Crimean bridge.
The 38-minute recording was dated Feb. 19. Simonyan said that four Luftwaffe officers, including Luftwaffe commander General Gerhards and Brigadier General Grefeld, participated in the discussions, which mainly focused on the specific details of providing Ukraine with Taurus cruise missiles, how to strike at the Crimean bridge, and how to clear the suspicion of Germany's direct involvement in the conflict.
Simonyan said that the recording was provided to her by Russian security**.
On the same day that she got the recording, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz also said that he would not provide Ukraine with "Taurus" cruise missiles, on the grounds that the launch of "Taurus" would require soldiers to assist on the ground, a practice that would make Germany a "participant in the war".
Seeing the above, I don't know what my friends think. It occurred to me that I might have misunderstood Sulz.
This German chancellor actually wants to quietly help Ukraine without Russia finding out.
But I didn't expect that the Russian intelligence service still obtained the ** call recording.
From this, it can be seen that there must be Russian spies in the German intelligence services, or in other words, there must be Russian spies within the German army.
After the incident, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz was furious, calling the leak a "very serious problem".
It is estimated that he is also confused now, what is the problem? How did this recording get out?
It can be seen from this that Russia's intelligence work is also very powerful, and Ukraine did not announce that Zaluzhny was dismissed before, and there has been a rumor on the Russian side, which shows that the spies planted by Russia in Ukraine have long known that Ukraine has made a decision to dismiss Zaluzhny.
There is no sword and sword in intelligence work, but every move is powerful.
After this recording was leaked, Germany was very passive.
In response to this incident, the Russian side demanded an explanation from Germany. Russian spokeswoman Zakharova said on the evening of March 1 that Russia will ask the German side to give an explanation on the German military officer's talk about the bombing of the Crimean bridge.
Zakharova believes that the German side is obliged to clarify as soon as possible, and trying to evade answering this question will be considered an admission of its fault.
Subsequently, Russia's *** Minister Sergei Lavrov said that the recording made NATO "lose face".
Lavrov noted that as can be seen from the attempts of the German side to disguise or conceal it, the German side is perfectly well aware that they are discussing the issue of direct participation in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.
I'm very strange, from which angle did the Russian *** minister and *** spokesman say that Germany's participation in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict is not okay?
According to the Russian side, Germany will not be able to participate in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, and it will not be able to help Ukraine blow up the Crimean bridge.
The problem is that Russia first started a war against Ukraine, which is an act of aggression.
If Ukraine is not helped to win this war, once Russia annexes Ukraine, no country in Europe will be spared.
It's called cold lips and teeth.
Therefore, it is completely understandable that Germany is helping Ukraine, and France has also said that it will send ground troops to Ukraine.
I feel that if Russia is pressing, Germany may no longer hide it, but like Britain and France, it will directly clarify its position, that is, to help Ukraine and see what Russia can do!
In fact, Russia is slowly pushing some neutral countries that want to compromise to its opposite, step by step.
If it weren't for this Russian war against Ukraine, Finland and Sweden, which turned out to be some neutral countries, would not have joined NATO.
If Russia does not invade Ukraine, then Britain will not take the initiative to help Ukraine fight Russia, and Russia will have one less enemy.
If Russia does not invade Ukraine and does not fool Hamas into attacking Israel, Israel will not be so hostile to Russia and then take the initiative to help Ukraine.
It can be said that Russia's war has pushed some countries that are friendly to him to his opposite.
Russia is already the largest country in the world in terms of area, so why is it so eager to annex the territory of Ukraine?
Writing this, I suddenly thought about how good it would be if Russia did not start a war on Ukraine, and how good it would be that the world would still be so peaceful.
For the current Russia-Ukraine war, no matter what the future holds, I firmly believe:
Darkness cannot defeat light, and barbarism cannot defeat civilization in the end.
It is impossible for someone to miss the glory days of the Soviet Union, to dream of pulling the whole world back by himself, to try to pull back to the old jungle era.
The tide of the world is mighty, and human society will eventually break through all the barriers of barbarism and darkness and move towards light and civilization.
The former German fascists and Japanese imperialism have all disappeared and integrated into civilized society.
And what about Russia?
The long river of history despises all thrills, and only at the moment when the rivers return to the sea do people suddenly understand what it is.
The inevitability of history!