Challenges and doubts: The dilemmas behind the defeat of the Chinese men's basketball team
by the author next to the pitch.
On February 25, Beijing time, the men's basketball team's record of undefeated Japan in the 88 FIBA tournament ended in the fierce collision of the Asian qualifiers. In this game, the Chinese team led in the first quarter, but was reversed by Japan at the last minute and finally lost 73-76. An unexpected defeat reflects a series of problems for the Chinese men's basketball team in the Asian arena.
A difficult start to the new season
In the opening game, Hu Jinqiu's outstanding performance was encouraging, he forced Hawkinson and hit a three-point shot to help the Chinese team take the lead for a while. However, this impressive start did not last. Soon, the Chinese team lost its advantage after a halftime substitution in the first quarter, and the opponent quickly equalized the score. The referee's controversial decision in the game also raised questions, Hawkinson's pushing under the basket was indulged, and the referee's penalty for Hu Jinqiu caused even more dissatisfaction.
Tactical tweaks and offensive troubles
In the face of Japan's stubborn defense, the Chinese team looked weak on the offensive end. In the third quarter, Hu Mingxuan missed 5 consecutive shots, China's advantage on the inside was abandoned, and the three-point shots on the outside were repeatedly unsuccessful. The problem of attacking has become a major problem for the Chinese team, and it is worrying that they will not be able to effectively deal with the opponent's adjustment.
The referee's contest
The referee's decision during the match raised a lot of doubts. It's not just that Hu Jinqiu was pushed under the basket and didn't foul, but what is even more puzzling is that the referee actually let Hu Jinqiu be sentenced to an offensive foul for tripping Kawamura. Under such a penalty, Djordjevic could only choose to replace Hu Jinqiu, who had already committed 2 fouls, in order to protect the sharp weapon under the basket.
Mistakes in the final quarter and controversy with the referee
In the crucial final quarter, the mistakes of the Chinese team and the controversial decision of the referee became the main reasons for the loss. With 1 minute 09 seconds left in the game, Hu Mingxuan's fatal mistake was stealed by Hawkinson, which eventually led to the score being pulled away. Although Cheng Shuaipeng continued to hit three points and scored one penalty than Ejima, the Chinese team failed to succeed in the counterattack.
Data analysis: The devil is in the details
The data in the game also fully illustrates the duel between the two sides. Hu Jinqiu had 23 points and 13 rebounds, Hu Mingxuan had 20 points, 4 rebounds and 2 assists, while Japan, Baba had 24 points, Hawkinson had 14 points and 13 rebounds, and Kawamura had 10 points, 4 rebounds and 3 assists. However, mistakes in detail and the referee's decision had a profound impact on the game, deciding the outcome of the game.
Future prospects and improvement directions
This loss has left the Chinese men's basketball team facing a series of challenges in the new season. On the offensive end, there is a need for more flexible tactics to deal with the opponent's adjustments, and on the defensive end, it is also necessary to strengthen teamwork and reduce mistakes. Referee decision disputes need to be taken seriously, and it may be necessary to communicate effectively with the referee before the game to ensure the fairness of the game.
Conclusion: Reflection and transcendence
This loss is a warning and a reflection for the Chinese men's basketball team in Asia. In the predicament, only by deeply reflecting and finding the root of the problem can we reach a higher level in the future competition. For fans, we need to give more support and encouragement to the team, and I believe that with the joint efforts of the coaching staff and players, the Chinese men's basketball team will be able to usher in a more brilliant tomorrow.