In rural areas, the role of village cadres is like that of the head of the village, who is responsible for helping everyone take care of various affairs so that the village can operate in harmony and peace. Recently, however, some of the farmer partners have begun to express dissatisfaction with how the village cadres manage the village, and they feel that the village cadres have not achieved fairness and justice, and some of the farmer partners have even put forward a bold idea - should the village cadre system be abolished?
Such an idea is not without reason. Farmers hope that the village cadres can be like a good patriarch, not only fair and just, but also able to lead everyone to get rich together. But in fact, some village cadres are not doing well enough, and some even make the people in the village feel the loss because of some of their own misdeeds, which affects everyone's daily life and work. Even so, there are still people who stand up against the idea of abolishing the village cadre system. They believe that after all, the village cadres are elected by everyone and represent the trust of the villagers. Village cadres play an important role in helping the village develop, convey policy information, and manage public affairs in the village. They pointed out that only a small number of village cadres have not done a good job, but the majority of village cadres are still very responsible. If the village cadre system is really abolished, it may make the order of the village even more chaotic.
In order to solve this problem, the state has proposed a new plan, that is, to set up a new agency called "agricultural management", hoping to improve rural management through this body. "Agricultural management"They are responsible for law enforcement in agriculture and, importantly, they do not have the power to collect fees and do not interfere with rural production and business activities. However, there is still a big difference between the work of "agricultural management" and the work of village cadres. "Agricultural management" is mainly responsible for the implementation of laws and regulations, while village cadres have a wider range of responsibilities, including not only economic and social management, but also contribute to the overall development of the village. This means that the "agricultural management" and the village cadres have their own division of labor, and they need to cooperate with each other to jointly contribute to the governance and development of the villages.
Therefore, while some have called for the abolition of the village cadre system, this proposal is not a suitable solution. Village cadres are still very necessary in the management of our rural areas. The establishment of "agricultural management" is to provide more professional support in specific fields, such as the order of the agricultural market and the protection of farmers' rights and interests. Village cadres and "agricultural management" should be complementary in their relationship, and they can work together to help our villages move towards a more modern and orderly tomorrow.
By looking at the surrounding examples, we can see more clearly how village cadres and "agricultural management" play a role in practical work. For example, in some villages, some long-standing problems have been solved through the efforts of "agricultural management", such as the illegal occupation of land, which has been effectively curbed. At the same time, the village cadres of these villages are not idle, and they are working hard to improve the infrastructure of the villages and improve the living standards of the villagers. Such stories tell us that village cadres and "agricultural managers" shine in their respective positions and bring positive changes to the village.
Finally, if we want to make our countryside better, we need to work together. Village cadres and "agricultural management" are like the two hands of the village, and only when they work together can our village become stronger and richer.