"One person is the president of 40 hospitals" Don't use the "medical community" as a shield
Text: Spicy new language Wu Nengen.
Recently, a notice on the appointment of the president issued by Huaiji County Hospital in Guangdong Province has attracted widespread attention. The fact that this director has single-handedly served as the director of 40 hospitals is a staggering number.
The response of the local health bureau was even more ridiculous, blaming the phenomenon on the "medical community" measures and claiming that the director only received one salary. This response is clearly an attempt to cover up the essence of the problem by using the "medical community" as a shield.
The "medical community" was originally a reform measure implemented to optimize the allocation of medical resources and improve the efficiency of medical services. Its purpose is to achieve resource sharing and coordinated development through the integration of medical institutions in the region, and provide better medical services for patients.
However, the phenomenon of "one person serving as the director of 40 hospitals" runs counter to the original intention of the "medical community". This not only violates the basic principles of management, but also raises questions about the actual effect of the "medical community".
From a management point of view, a person's energy and abilities are limited. How can you be the director of 40 hospitals at the same time to ensure that each hospital is adequately watched and managed? Such an arrangement will not only lead to inefficient management, but may also affect the operation and development of the hospital.
As the core leader of the hospital, the director needs to have overall planning, direction and supervision of all affairs of the hospital. And when a person is allocated to 40 hospitals, there will inevitably be a situation of distraction and poor management, which is undoubtedly a potential threat to the development of the hospital and the interests of patients.
In addition, this phenomenon has raised concerns about the excessive concentration of power. Does one person holding the management of so many hospitals easily breed corruption and abuse of power? In this case, how to ensure that the hospital's decision-making is fair and transparent, and how to prevent personal interests from taking precedence over public interests? These are questions that require us to think deeply.
The local health bureau's response with "only one salary" is a perfunctory response to public concerns. Salary is only one aspect of the issue, and more important is duty and responsibility. If a person undertakes such a heavy management task, can he truly fulfill the duties of the president and be responsible for the development of each hospital? None of this can be measured by the amount of salary.
The phenomenon of one person serving as the president of 40 hospitals reflects the problems and challenges that may exist in the process of promoting medical reform. We should not just regard it as an isolated phenomenon, but should pay enough attention to and reflect on it.
In the process of deepening medical reform, we must adhere to the principle of people-oriented and scientific management, pay attention to the design and implementation of the system, and avoid problems such as excessive concentration of power and unclear responsibilities.
At the same time, we also need to carry out more in-depth thinking and exploration for the construction of the "medical community". How to integrate medical resources while ensuring the scientificity and effectiveness of management? How to establish a sound supervision mechanism to prevent abuse of power? All these need to be constantly explored and improved in practice.
In short, the phenomenon of "one person serving as the director of 40 hospitals" is not just an isolated case, but also a warning. We should not laugh at it, but should take it more seriously, delve into the root cause of the problem, and seek solutions. Only in this way can we promote the further development of health care reform and achieve better medical services and public health and well-being.
At the same time, it is also hoped that the relevant departments can take the public's doubts seriously and give more reasonable and convincing explanations and solutions, so that the "medical community" can truly play its due role, instead of becoming a tool for some people to expand their power. List of high-quality authors