In recent years, there have been many people who have criticized Mr. Mo Yan, but now this kind of Internet celebrity who sued him and demanded compensation of 1.2 billion yuan is really unprecedented.
The reason for the prosecution is also very unique, insulting the martyrs and hurting their feelings has suddenly been raised to a moral level, and smearing China is the spokesperson of foreign forces.
Some people say that this is the result of so many years of education, others say that this is the sadness of an era, and others say that this is the awakening of a new generation.
Leaving aside whether it is awakening for the time being, the reason for his lawsuit is very strange, and he was on the so-called right side from the beginning, and it is difficult for people to refute it, because the rebuttal is dangerous.
The publisher of the book is still very brave to say that there is no problem with the content, and there is no evidence of the Internet celebrity.
So the question is, is there any basis for what the Internet celebrity said about Mo Yan's smearing based on his own understanding and the information he received?
According to the current non-professional history books and content, then his behavior can be understood and can be said to be correct, because the popular history books, the description of that period of history is positive and positive, and it is the content of the Spring and Autumn Period, including primary and secondary schools and even history majors.
As a graduate of history, I know how difficult it is to study modern and modern history, how big the minefield is, how lacking the research materials are, or how useless they are.
When I was in school, my teacher said that the current textbook is not history, but a special party history.
Therefore, the Internet celebrity can see that what Mo Yan wrote is so dirty, so smearing the motherland and martyrs, and so angry that he has to use 1.2 billion compensation to calm his anger.
And then the problem is that the law gives you the right, in a society under the legal system, as long as you are legal, you can sue anyone, which is understandable, but the Internet celebrity also posted threatening content, claiming that if the law can't solve it, you can do it yourself, which is a proper personal threat.
Do you say that he understands the law, he should understand, because he said that his rights have been violated, and he wants to sue the person who violated him, do you say that he wants to use the law to protect his hurt feelings, and then he nakedly threatens the personal safety of the person he wants to sue, this contradictory thing, why?
The answer to this question may be known only to you.
The rights granted to people by law are for the purpose of better safeguarding the rights and interests of individuals, and are free will on the premise of not intruding on the interests of others, and are not a means to restrict and kidnap others with morality and national righteousness.
Finally, if you really want to know the answer to history, what happened in a particular era, then go to a more traditional university, listen to the lectures of old professors of history, and listen to the kind of professional discussions that are not lectures in front of books, in a small area.
If you really feel that there is something wrong with his work, you will sue and exercise your rights, instead of using ** to destroy others on the Internet, threatening others with violent remarks, and not using sky-high compensation to win traffic.
**10,000 Fans Incentive Plan