The Armed Police Force, the full name of which is the Chinese People's Armed Police Force, is an important armed force in our country. As for "whether the armed police are military or police", in fact, the issue of the identity and attributes of the armed police force is involved. To answer this question, we need to conduct an in-depth analysis from many aspects such as the historical background, functional positioning, and legal status of the armed police force.
From the perspective of historical background, the predecessor of the armed police force can be traced back to the public security force in the early days of the founding of the People's Republic of China. At that time, the public security forces were mainly responsible for maintaining public order and cracking down on crime. With the development of the country and the changes in the security situation, the public security force has gradually evolved into today's armed police force. Therefore, the People's Armed Police Force has had close ties with the public security system since its birth.
From the perspective of functional positioning, the main responsibility of the armed police force is to maintain the country's internal security and social stability. This includes the protection of important targets and facilities, the maintenance of public order, and the security of participation in major events. These responsibilities bear a strong resemblance to the work of the public security system, which is one of the reasons why the PAPF is often mistaken for part of the public security system.
However, from the perspective of legal status, there is a clear distinction between the identity of the armed police force and the public security system. The armed police force belongs to the military ranks, and its officers and men have military status and enjoy the same treatment and rights as servicemen on active duty. On the other hand, the police in the public security system have police status, and their duties and rights are different from those of the officers and soldiers of the armed police force.
So, why is there a question of whether the armed police force is a military or a police member? This is mainly due to the fact that the PAPF often works closely with the public security system in the performance of its tasks, and even in some places, the PAPF and the police of the public security system share certain tasks. This model of cooperation makes it easy to confuse the two.
In fact, although there is a certain overlap between the work of the armed police force and the public security system, there is a clear difference between their identities and attributes. As a part of the armed forces, the officers and men of the armed police force have military status and enjoy the same treatment and rights as servicemen on active duty. On the other hand, the police in the public security system have police status, and their duties and rights are different from those of the officers and soldiers of the armed police force.
To sum up, the People's Armed Police Force is a unit with military status, and its officers and men enjoy the same treatment and rights and interests as servicemen on active duty. Although in practice, the PAPF has close cooperation with the public security system, but this does not change their respective identities and attributes. Therefore, the answer to the question of "whether the armed police are military or police members" is clear: the armed police force is a unit with military status.