In mid-March, Russia will hold a grand ** election. Some friends say that Putin in Russia is the best candidate and will inevitably become the best candidate. But other "green leaves" must also meet the basic bottom line and cannot be treasonous. In fact, there is another one, you cannot oppose the military conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and you cannot oppose this military conflict in the name of peace.
Sergei Mironov, a member of the fourth largest party in the Russian parliament and leader of the Just Russia party, demanded that Davankov be removed from the list of candidates because of his anti-war stance.
Sergey said that Davankov wanted to be a peacemaker. Davankov demanded that the sons of the front be returned to their mothers, fathers to their children, husbands to their wives, and that he was the only one who opposed the stupid "hawks" and "politicians of the last century", which is not what Russia needs now. Sergei is convinced that with such an anti-war position, Davankov deserves to be deprived of his Russian candidacy. Here is a little episode that appeared on the eve of the elections in Russia.
Davankov was indeed an advocate of peace and a representative of the anti-war movement. Is he anti-war or anti-Putin? Russia is now riding a tiger, and this military conflict must be carried out to the end. Russia has no way out, and Russia's way out is the disintegration of Russia, so anti-war is precisely to help Western countries to confront Russia and let Russia enter the abyss from which it will never recover.
Davankov's idea of peace at this time, and the idea of anti-war must be out of place, but will Davankov be deprived of the qualification of the ** candidate because of this?
I don't think so, why? Because he is only one of dozens of candidates. How many people support his anti-war stance is a good idea to see by the votes in the election. According to the message, Putin has the support of 80%. Whether or not Davankov's anti-war stance can gain some support is the most crucial thing.
Since it was an open election, why was Davankov not allowed to express his position? Forcibly removing him from the list of candidates is not a democratic consideration. I believe that Putin will not take such extreme measures, and since he is also one of the candidates, he must take into account the influence of Western countries, and allowing Davankov to become a candidate is an important manifestation of the real fairness and justice of the election.