Recently, the Arab world has made a major decision to lie flat and choose to remain neutral in the Gaza Strip conflict. This decision has aroused widespread concern and discussion in the international community.
On 18 November, the Jordanian Foreign Minister delivered a speech on behalf of the Arab countries, stating that the Arab countries would not send ground troops to the Gaza Strip and would not intervene in the conflict created by Israel. This position is an indication of the attitude of the Arab States towards the conflict and their determination to remain neutral.
Subsequently, the King of Jordan met with visiting EU President Ursula von der Leyen and stressed the need for the international community to take immediate action to halt the escalation of the conflict in the Gaza Strip and to protect civilians and ensure uninterrupted humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip. This statement reflects the King of Jordan's concern about the conflict and the safety of civilians, as well as his expectation that the EU will play an important role in resolving the issue.
On the other hand, a joint delegation of foreign ministers of Arab and Islamic countries will visit China from November 20 to 21, with the aim of promoting in-depth communication and coordination in de-escalating the current Palestinian-Israeli conflict, protecting civilians, and resolving the Palestinian issue in a just manner. This is an indication of the efforts and aspirations of the international community to resolve the conflict.
However, the attitude of the international community towards the Palestinian-Israeli conflict in the Middle East is not consistent. The U.S. and Western bloc supports countries such as Israel, China and Iran in playing an active role in calling for a two-state solution and justice for Palestine.
Turkey and other countries have imposed a series of sanctions on the diplomatic front and expressed accusations against Israel. However, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and other countries pretended to want to stand up for Palestine, but in fact did not take substantive action.
In this case, should China intervene? I believe that we have played an active role in the international community and have done what we need to do.
For China, independence, sovereignty, and rejuvenation are very sacred, but for other countries, they may not be seen as such. As a major power outside the region, China is too busy with its own affairs, and the Frog Island issue has not yet been resolved. We should be clear that if we cross the line, we will incur more problems.
In general, the resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict in the Middle East requires the joint efforts of the international community, and all countries should respect each other's positions, respect the rights and interests of the Palestinian people, and seek a peaceful solution.
China has already played an active role in this and should not cross the line. It is hoped that all parties will work together to make more contributions to peace and stability in the Middle East. The international community has adopted different attitudes toward the Palestinian-Israeli conflict in the Middle East.