After watching 8 episodes of Fireworks People , I understood the real reason why the audience has m

Mondo Social Updated on 2024-03-07

"Fireworks People" in the eyes of the audience: the dispute between plot flaws and actors' performance.

Introduction. In recent years, the TV drama market has become fiercely competitive, and the audience's requirements for the quality of works have gradually increased. However, even with a strong cast and well-made, there are still many works that have received bad reviews from the audience due to plot flaws. Among them, the high-profile "Fireworks People" is a typical case. This article will delve into the plot flaws of "Fireworks People" and the dispute over the performance of the actors in the eyes of the audience, and analyze the reasons and effects.

Plot analysis. The opening plot of "Fireworks People" attracted attention, but as the plot progressed, the audience began to find flaws in it one after another. On the one hand, the plot setting is unreasonable and full of bloody plots. The relationship between the characters is intricate, and the emotional development is abrupt and lacks depth, making it difficult for the audience to resonate emotionally. On the other hand, the plot twist is exaggerated, contrary to common sense and authenticity, making it difficult for the audience to accept. These problems cause the audience to question the plot and affect the overall perception.

The irrationality of the plot setting is reflected in the behavior of the characters and the development of the plot. Viewers pointed out that some of the characters behaved in an exaggerated manner, making it hard to believe that this was a real-life episode. For example, the decisions and actions of the characters in some episodes appear absurd and detached from the logic of real life. And the development of the plot is often jumpy and incoherent, making it difficult for the audience to understand and accept. The irrationality of this plot design directly affects the audience's evaluation and recognition of the work.

Evaluation of the main actors.

Despite the flaws in the plot, the excellent performance of the main actors still deserves recognition. Especially Qiao Haiyun, played by Song Chunli brilliantly, adds a lot to the drama. Her superb acting skills injected a strong dramatic color into the whole play, which impressed the audience. However, the excellent performance of the actors does not hide the problems of the plot itself. Audiences have said that although the actors have shown an inconvenient charm through their own efforts, the choreography and setting of the plot itself are too bizarre to make it difficult to resonate with real life.

The actors do their best to interpret the characters in the play through their superb performances, so that people can empathize with the fate of the characters. However, these excellent performances could not make up for the flaws in the plot setting, resulting in a great reduction in the overall look and feel. The audience began to question whether the setting and development of the characters in the play were reasonable, and whether their actions were in line with the logic of reality. The refraction of this point of view directly affects the evaluation and recognition of the work.

The reason for the audience's bad review.

The audience's negative reviews of "Pyrotechnics" are mainly focused on the plot. They think that the plot setting is unreasonable and full of bloody plots. The relationships between the characters are intricate, and the emotional development is abrupt and lacks depth. The plot twists are exaggerated, contrary to common sense and authenticity. Although the actors' performances are good, they can't hide the flaws in the plot. These problems make the audience's sense of identity with the plot decrease, affecting the overall viewing experience.

The audience's dissatisfaction with the plot setting and character creation mainly stems from two aspects. On the one hand, the drama shows a large number of bloody plots and unreasonable character behaviors, which make the audience feel difficult to accept and understand. On the other hand, the relationship and emotional development of the characters appear too abrupt and lack authenticity and credibility. These issues directly affect the audience's overall evaluation and recognition of the work.

Conclusion. By analyzing "Fireworks People" in the eyes of the audience, we not only saw a drama, but also understood the audience's expectations for high-quality works and their call for real emotions. The audience's bad reviews pointed out problems in the plot and character building, which affected the overall perception. Therefore, we call on the audience to cherish every work, actively express their views, and jointly promote the progress of the film and television industry.

To the readers. The audience's evaluation is the most direct feedback on the quality of the work, and it is also the source of motivation for the continuous progress of the film and television industry. In the ** TV series, you may wish to think more critically and look at the plot setting and character building rationally, in order to get a richer and deeper viewing experience. At the same time, it is also expected that the producers can listen to the opinions of the audience, continuously improve and improve the quality of the works, and jointly create a more prosperous and diverse film and television cultural environment.

List of high-quality authors

Related Pages