Fig**Internet (if there is any infringement, please contact to delete).
"First degree discrimination" has been on the hot search list many times, which is a topic that many people are concerned about.
Some of the people who feel the most unfair and powerless are those who work hard after entering the university, they did not enter the prestigious university as an undergraduate, but after four years of college successfully landed as a graduate student of a famous university, they thought that with the label of "graduate student of a famous school" and their own efforts, they could be favored, but they did not expect to lose in the end on the "first degree".
The "first degree" is not the shame of everyone, but the shame of a specific group, this specific group refers to those groups who "have a very common undergraduate, but graduate students go to a famous school", the same graduate students of famous schools, the same excellent, the same hard work, the same motivation, but the "first degree" has become their only failure.
Because Ding Hui, a variety show that has attracted much attention, his performance in the show is a representative, and he has aroused everyone's empathy, so he has received a lot of attention.
After working for two years, he was admitted to a prestigious graduate school through hard work, and deliberately avoided talking about undergraduate experience during the interview, but this is a topic that cannot be escaped, and undergraduate experience will definitely become the focus of attention of the interviewer.
Ding Hui is lucky, many people have not been magnified into the public eye, and there is no such opportunity at all.
Ding Hui's sense of escape when talking about the first degree is what people usually call the "shame of the first degree", and the reason why they have such feelings is because the first degree brings them too much trouble, and they are often held back by the "first degree".
Since the "first degree" has attracted the attention of so many people, and many people are complaining that enterprises value the "first degree", if the concept of "first degree" is called for, will it be supported by everyone?
There is already an answer, and the result is more opposition.
Academician Pan Fusheng, a representative of the National People's Congress, proposed to abolish the first academic qualification, and Academician Pan mentioned that some employers only have the "origin theory" of the school, and he pointed out that this phenomenon has appeared in the process of graduate enrollment and employment, which is a manifestation of unfair education and employment, and that there are differences in the types and characteristics of various colleges and universities, which should not become the threshold for admission to further studies and job hunting.
Academician Pan pointed out that the theory of school origin is very harmful, and suggested that the concept of "first degree" in student files and job resumes should be eliminated, and the explicit and implicit restrictions on the "origin" of the school should be removed.
Academician Pan said it very well, and also mentioned some employersOnly the school "origin theory".This suggestion of his was made on this basis.
Expanding to the Internet, the focus of discussion has become whether to abolish the "first degree".
I thought that many people supported it, but there were more voices of opposition in the comment area, and some people even said, "The first degree is the fairest".
There must be great drawbacks in the theory of school origin.
And the theory of school-only origin must also be relatively common.
It is also unrealistic to have a thorough first degree.
In fact, "only learn" nerds, is not common, ability and education to a certain extent is related, when the employer recruits, it must be based on a certain standard as the core, to choose from a large number of job seekers, if the number of job seekers is relatively small, then through the comprehensive assessment, you can choose out, if the number of job seekers is large, for example, a position receives dozens or even hundreds of resumes, let these job seekers come to interview, it is unrealistic, and there is no such meaning, If a position requires 1 person, it is normal to select 5 resumes from a large number of interviewers.
So what are the criteria for screening? Does a resume look good? Work experience? Or is it a personality, or something else?
The most objective criterion must be academic qualifications, which is also a fairer and more reliable screening method, and then comprehensively other aspects, such as personal experience, such as on-site performance, such as way of thinking, etc., to make the final screening.
If the concept of the first degree disappears completely, the good thing is that it means that parents no longer roll their children's college entrance examination at that time, and it is the same which school they are admitted to, anyway, it doesn't matter what kind of university they enter the college entrance examination, and the recruiting unit does not look at this academic standard.
On the one hand, the bad thing is that everyone starts to roll in college, that is to say, after high school, the first degree is not important, the final degree is important, whether it is a junior college, an undergraduate, whether it is a general school, a famous school, it is not important, it is important which school the graduate student enters.
Taking a step back, if the graduate degree is no longer important, the employer does not look at the academic qualifications, and the academic qualifications have completely disappeared (which is an unrealistic assumption), then what is the use of studying? Anyway, when children become adults, job hunting is not based on academic qualifications.
To put it bluntly, it is to roll in whatever direction you take as the standard, that's for sure.
There is no need to cancel, and it can't be canceled, the concept is deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, and the system can't control the choice of the recruiting unit, even if it is not allowed to mention the "first degree", when the employer recruits graduate students, two people with similar abilities, when making a choice, will still tend to look at the first degree, which is not unacceptable.
However, the "only school origin theory" is indeed extreme, but the enterprise will have its own evaluation standards, what kind of people to use, what kind of people to recruit, there is always a set of assessment standards, the purpose is to create value for the enterprise, if there is a problem with the company's employment standards, the enterprise will not last long.
As long as the education system exists, as long as this set of social mechanisms exists, this concept will not be eliminated.