Taiwan Island shouted that it was forbidden to cross the line, Hong XiuzhuIt is rare to go out of the mountain within hours, and the situation changes.
Before reading this article, you are welcome to click "Follow" to facilitate your discussion and sharing, and at the same time, it will also allow you to get a deeper sense of participation, thank you for your support.
Although the mainland and Taiwan belong to the same China, and there is no insurmountable chasm or boundary, Taiwan recently seized mainland fishermen and boats on the grounds that it "crossed the border."
This absurd statement makes the mainland feel both helpless and ridiculous. However, in less than 24 hours, Hong Xiuzhu, the former chairman of the Kuomintang, made a rare statement of his opinion, pointing directly at the stakes.
The current situation is very different, Tsai Ing-wen insists on ** regardless of the consequences, and in the end she will only suffer the consequences. At this critical juncture, it is hoped that the **elements and **bosses** will carefully consider their actions.
Blindly being close to the United States will only lead to a fire, and the United States may light a fire, but will they be able to control it? Tsai Ing-wen should not joke about the safety of the lives and property of tens of millions of Taiwan compatriots, just to satisfy her own selfish desires.
So, let's dive into the truth of this incident together.
Taiwan's seizure of mainland fishing boats and fishermen is vexatious. The one-China principle is the consensus of the international community, but now the Taiwan authorities are using this as an excuse to detain people for no reason, which is a blatant challenge to the mainland's bottom line, which has not only caused internal strife between the two sides of the strait, but also brought unnecessary misunderstanding and wrong hints to the people on the island.
It seems that the targets of Taiwan's "Coast Guard" patrol boats have also made mistakes, and the real problem may lie in internal differences and contradictions. Therefore, the unity of the masses on both sides of the strait is particularly important.
Historically, the people of Taiwan have united to resist foreign invaders, and even though the two sides of the strait are separated, their hearts are still together. Ideological bias can be more problematic than coercion.
Therefore, the mainland must seriously deal with and declare the claim of "crossing the border" and urge the Taiwan authorities to immediately release the mainland fishermen.
The mainland has given Taiwan and the ** elements countless opportunities to correct their mistakes, but the ** elements are still constantly finding fault. The previous "transgression" incident was a manifestation of their clumsiness.
The Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council has long made its position clear, and the mainland can no longer tolerate such behavior. We hope that the two sides of the strait can coexist peacefully, and we are not willing to allow interference forces from the outside world to succeed.
The Taiwan side should stop seizing mainland fishing boats and ensure the safety of the lives and property of the people concerned. The mainland's attitude towards the provocation of the ** elements will be even more resolute.
Hong Hsiu-chu, former chairman of the Kuomintang, also expressed dissatisfaction with their actions, stressing that Taiwan is at a crossroads of war and peace, and the choice is in Taiwan's own hands.
** All means are being used to exacerbate cross-strait contradictions, and even collude with external forces to magnify internal problems to the international level. They purchase large quantities of **, which has long gone beyond the scope of autonomy granted by the mainland.
At the same time, they used ** to incite the "battle in the Taiwan Strait" in an attempt to deceive the people on the island and intensify the hatred between the two sides of the strait. They have constantly stirred up incidents and escalated cross-strait tensions.
They even claim that the "median line of the strait" is just wishful thinking on their part, and that mainland fishermen's fishing boats are merely operating legally. However, it is an unchangeable fact that Taiwan has been China's inviolable territory since ancient times.
China has experienced the trauma of sovereignty and territorial integrity in its history and will never repeat the same mistakes in the past.
The "crossing the line" incident makes people reflect on the fact that the Taiwan authorities still naively believe that Taiwan can become independent and that the United States and Japan will lend a helping hand. However, Taiwan is nothing more than a pawn used by the United States to interfere in China's development, and trying to disrupt Taiwan will only cause damage to China's economy.
The mainland and Taiwan are an inseparable whole. We cannot forget the suffering suffered by the Chinese people more than 70 years ago, and Japan's crimes have not been squarely faced and recognized, or even glorified.
This kind of behavior is disrespectful to China and indifferent to history.
The mainland's hope for Taiwan has not changed, just like an endlessly tolerant mother, opening her arms again and again, looking forward to the "child" who has lost her way and returned home. At the same time, however, we also hope that Taiwan will be considerate of the mainland's position and will not ignore our warnings.
It is not that we dare not or cannot do unification, but we do not want to see innocent people harmed. We call on the two sides of the strait to resolve the issue through dialogue and consultation and realize peaceful reunification.
If the conditions for peaceful reunification do not exist, we will be forced to take the necessary measures, but we will do everything to avoid war.
Taiwan's shouting caused *** tension, and the Chinese people reiterated that the bottom line cannot be crossed. Hong Xiuzhu, former chairman of the Kuomintang, denounced the remarks and called on the people of Taiwan to recognize the reality and jointly safeguard cross-strait peace.
What is your view on the cross-strait boundary and Hong Xiuzhu's remarks? Welcome to communicate in the comment area**.