1. What is the significance of delineating the baselines of the territorial sea in the northern part of the Beibu Gulf?
In accordance with the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Sea and the Law of the People's Republic of China on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone, the width of China's territorial sea is 12 nautical miles from the baselines of the territorial sea. The establishment of the baselines of the territorial sea of the Beibu Gulf is another key step beyond the delineation of the baselines of China's territorial waters. The delineation of the baselines in the northern part of the Beibu Gulf is the second step in a three-step process of delineating the baselines of China's territorial waters, the first of which was to delineate from Gaojiao in Shandong Province to the south to the cliffs of Hainan Island in 1996. Today, we have finally finished drawing the southern part of the country, from the cliff corner on the west side of Hainan Island to the Sino-Vietnamese border line, and the third step left is this section of the Sino-DPRK border in the north. Now that the second step has finally been taken, it is very significant. By determining 7 basis points this time, we can further clarify on the chart the outer limits of our territorial waters in the Gulf of Tonkin and even the outer limits of 200 nautical miles.
The determination of the baselines of the territorial waters of the Beibu Gulf is important not only for ships and cargo, but also for aircraft and passengers on board.
On the plane, there is also the so-called service issue at the legal level, and it is also important whether you are serving a judicial document in the field of China. When an aircraft is considered to be in China's domain, it depends on the outer limits of the territorial waters, and whether the external limits of the territorial waters can be drawn clearly on the nautical chart.
Second, the United States**: The death of Zhao Anji, chairman of Fumao Group, is not a typical accident, and a criminal investigation is underway.
Ms. Zhao, 50, was found dead in the pond of a private ranch in Johnson City, Texas, shortly after midnight on Feb. 11, when rescuers pulled her out of a submerged car.
In a February 29 letter to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, the Blanco County Sheriff's Office said, "This incident is not a typical accident," according to CNBC. "Although the initial investigation revealed that it was an unfortunate accident, the sheriff's office investigated the accident as a criminal case until they had sufficient evidence to rule out criminal activity," the letter said. ”
As Zhao's death remains the subject of a criminal investigation, the Blanco County Sheriff's Office's public information** told the Attorney General, including police reports of the incident, transcripts of 911 reports, audio and video evidence, and other materials, that should not be disclosed to requested.
In a statement on Feb. 16, the sheriff's office said that "first responders tried to take emergency measures against Zhao Anji, but she died while underwater" and that "we have preliminarily determined that this was an unfortunate accident and the investigation is still ongoing." ”
Third, teachers in Guangfeng District, Shangrao, Jiangxi Province were asked to buy 1,000 yuan of agricultural products online?
A teacher in Guangfeng District, Shangrao, Jiangxi Province broke the news, and the local Education and Sports Bureau issued a notice requiring teachers in the district (all trade union members) to buy 1,000 yuan of agricultural products in the designated **. In order to improve the ranking of the district's online sales of agricultural products in the province. A teacher questioned that this move is suspected of forced consumption, "1,000 yuan is not a small amount, everyone has resistance, this time to ask to buy agricultural products, who knows if next time will ask to buy a car." Tsk, it's more likely to buy a house than a car. In this regard, the person in charge of the trade union of the Guangfeng District Education and Sports Bureau responded that the notice was true, and it turned out that the trade union members of all units in the district had been requested!
Moreover, it is said that other counties and districts are also doing the same thing, so what is the significance of this provincial ranking? Who is more than many, who is richer, who is more obedient?
Fourth, a female cleaner in Tongren, Guizhou Province, was detained for 15 days for "malicious rights protection"?
Recently, the judgment document website disclosed a judgment that caused controversy.
Sister Shao (pseudonym) in Tongren, Guizhou Province, was deducted 500 yuan from her salary by the company because she took a break from work, and she angrily sought justice with her colleagues, but was unexpectedly detained for 15 days on charges of disrupting the order of the unit.
This incident has aroused widespread concern in the society, and many people have questioned the protection of workers' rights and interests.
Sister Shao's story is not an isolated case. As a sanitation worker, she pays silently every day, but her salary is deducted because of rest. This made her feel deeply aggrieved, and at the same time, it also aroused the thinking of many workers about their rights.
After joining the company, Sister Shao found that the company had frequent wage deductions for no reason. After going through it with her colleagues, she bravely stood up and demanded that the company explain the reason for the deduction from her salary.
However, the poor attitude of the leaders and the treatment of employees like a piece of, which aroused the dissatisfaction of many sanitation workers.
In the process of the sanitation workers seeking a reasonable explanation, the company not only ignored it, but also escalated the problem to the first intervention.
The plot changed abruptly, Sister Shao and her colleagues expected the police to uphold justice for them, but they never thought that Sister Shao would be detained for disrupting the order of the unit!
Sister Shao was dissatisfied and sued the police station to the court, but the court rejected it in both the first and second instance.
It is not illegal to arbitrarily deduct workers' wages, and sanitation workers' door-to-door reasoning is determined to be malicious wage demand. Netizens sighed: To establish a sense of the rule of law, we must first establish the awareness of the rule of law in judicial organs.
Fifth, the implementation of the new express delivery regulations, there have been couriers resigned!
From March 1, 2024, the newly revised "Measures for the Administration of the Express Market" will be officially implemented, and the express delivery industry will usher in the "most stringent new regulations".
The measures stipulate that couriers shall not be placed on third-party platforms such as post stations and express boxes without authorization, and if the circumstances are serious, the postal administration will impose a fine of between 10,000 yuan and 30,000 yuan.
The new rules were said to be out, but they caused huge controversy.
Industry insiders said that the current express delivery method has not changed greatly, to "express door-to-door" mode, must increase the express delivery fee, the final cost or will be "paid" by consumers.
A netizen who was deeply troubled by "courier not coming to the door" said that he had encountered the situation that the courier could not get through, and the courier insisted on not being able to come to the door after communication, or that the rookie station was "running out" because of the early closure of the rookie station, and he is now very much looking forward to the changes brought by the new regulations.
In the eyes of couriers and post stations, the new regulations have not yet been implemented, and they have felt a chill. "Now there is a phenomenon of some couriers leaving. ”
The manager of a rookie post station said that if the delivery fee does not rise, it will be difficult for the express delivery to the door, "We receive more than 1,000 express deliveries every day, and if they are delivered to the door, we will probably hire 5 people, with a daily salary of 200 yuan, and only six cents per piece, which is not enough to pay wages, let alone rent and utility bills." ”
In response to the fine of "no door-to-door delivery" in the new regulations, the postal administration is responsible, and I don't know what kind of situation will occur.
Many couriers said that after the introduction of the new regulations, express delivery has not increased, and if the new regulations are implemented, not only the labor intensity will be greatly increased, but the income will also be greatly reduced.
The unit price of the courier delivery of three links and one reach is about 7 cents a single order, if you put it in the post station, the courier earns 4 cents, and the post station earns 3 cents. "The current delivery** can only be a loss-making transaction if it is required to be delivered to the door. He believes that the implementation of the new regulations will eventually require changes in the upstream and increase the unit price of downstream distribution.
For express delivery such as SF Express, JD.com and Tmall Supermarket, the cost of upstream express delivery is high, and the unit price of delivery by the courier is naturally high, and the courier is more willing to deliver to the door. "For example, Tmall supermarket can earn about 1 yuan 5 for home delivery. Jingdong Express per single ** in 12 yuan or so, while ordinary express delivery is only 0About 8 yuan.
Some consumers also think that it is actually very good to put it in the post station, and the pick-up is not limited by time. There is also a security issue if you come to the door.
The question is, whose opinion is listened to in the newly revised "Express Market Management Measures"?