According to the party Luo Chaoliang, the Sanjiang Town ** mentioned in the reply letter (actual reimbursement) is not true, and it is very clear in the 97 resolution that the two committees of Longtang Village have no economic strength, and entrusted the party Luo Chaoliang and other three people to contribute funds to resolve the land dispute with the Sanjiang Town Brick and Tile Factory. In the 97 resolution, it is clearly stated and promised that if compensation is obtained, 40% of the total income will be taken as the labor fee for handling the case, and there is no actual reimbursement. 
In the reply letter from Sanjiang Town (unanimously disagreeing to compensate you for labor expenses), it also supported the content of the meeting held in Longtang Village when the facts were obviously different from the investigation of Longtang Village, and whether it fulfilled its obligation to investigate. According to Article 30 of the Labor Contract Law of the People's Republic of China, an employer shall pay labor remuneration to the employee in full and in a timely manner in accordance with the provisions of the labor contract and national regulations. If the employer is in arrears or fails to pay the labor remuneration in full, the worker may apply to the local people's court for a payment order in accordance with the law, and the people's court shall issue a payment order in accordance with the law.
After Luo Chaoliang communicated and negotiated with his superiors many times, the facts won 88 acres of land, clearly allocated in the 2003 distribution agreement: 3 acres of Party A Longtang Village, 5 acres of Party B8 acres (19 acres, Wang Yongliang 096 acres remaining 2Article 8 of the 94 acres Luo Chaoliang) agreement clearly stipulates: In the future, the state will requisition and auction, Party A will perform Party A's land, Party B will perform Party B's land, and Party B's land will be requisitioned or auctioned with a commission of 5% to the village.
Longtang Village's non-performance of the contract violates Article 500 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China: if a party has any of the following circumstances in the process of concluding a contract, and causes losses to the other party, it shall be liable for damages. 1. Negotiate maliciously under the pretext of signing a contract; 2. Deliberately concealing important facts related to the conclusion of the contract or providing false information; 3. Other behaviors that violate the principle of good faith. and Article 578, if one of the parties expressly states or shows by its own conduct that it will not perform its contractual obligations, the other party may request it to bear the liability for breach of contract before the expiration of the performance period. The above distribution agreement is clear and uncontroversial, and after 20 years, it has not been fruitful, and the water in Sanjiang Town and Longtang Village is so deep that the people cannot breathe.
The manager of Sanjiang Town, the deputy secretary of the town (secretary of the Commission for Discipline Inspection) and Director Liu of Longtang Village, etcAnywayare unwilling to perform according to the agreementThe factual focus is as follows:
Director Liu's father of Longtang Village signed a lease agreement with Longtang Village (long-term lease of Longtang Village land for 8,000 yuan), and the subject matter of the agreement was not legalAccording to Article 705 of the Civil Code, the lease term shall not exceed 20 years, and the excess part exceeding 20 years shall be invalid. Compensation during the lease period Articles 707, 710 and 715 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China, the compensation standard for rural land expropriation is composed of land compensation, resettlement subsidies and seedling compensation. (Director Liu of Longtang Village will lease the land of Longtang Village and turn it into a high-rise building under the development eyelids through the relationship, which is valuable.)Thousandsmillion).
Director Liu of Longtang Village has not had his own industry for many years and has almost no income. Relying on the income of the village to maintain daily expenses (Director Liu used his authority to expropriate the resettlement land of the people in many places during his tenure, seeking personal interests, and harvesting thousands of square meters of resettlement houses and more than a dozen resettlement stores), the people of Longtang Village dared not speak out.
The deputy secretary of the manager of Sanjiang Town (secretary of the Commission for Discipline Inspection) and others did not agree to perform the contract in any case (Longtang Village signed a distribution agreement with Luo Chaoliang). As a public official, he can't do official business, and there is no spirit of contract, which not only violates professional ethics and conduct, but also discredits the image and reputation of the country and the country.
All the above reports are true, in order to maintain the law and justice, purify the social atmosphere, enhance the prestige of the party in the hearts of the broad masses of the people, and believe that Jinping County, Guizhou Province, is fair and honest, and will definitely act impartially. Here, we sincerely implore the leaders of the relevant departments to thoroughly investigate the facts, uphold justice, and restore the rights and interests of the victims.