The movie "Removing the Three Evils Around the Week" is being released in theaters, and I have already watched the film on the first day of its release. I'll talk a little bit about the film review first, but it should be helpful for fans who haven't watched the movie yet.
This movie, it's better not to take children**. I also said this in my review analysis of the movie "Article 20". The children's knowledge of sex is not enough to look at the current content of sex in the film from a dialectical perspective. Therefore, it is not that they are not allowed to see it in this life, but that they should only watch it after they have sufficient knowledge of correctness.
When I watched it in the cinema, I saw a few parents with children, and when it came to the "critical moment", they covered their children's eyes. Instead of going to the theater to cover your child's eyes, it is better to go to see it yourself and not take your child there.
And then talk about the article.
"Removing the Three Evils Around You" is actually a simple story if you look at it from a philosophical perspective. Of course, the story can be broken down into many philosophical fragments. At the end of a good movie, it's actually all philosophy. And philosophical discourse is not easy to explain to everyone, so it is told in stories, which is also universal. The value of "Removing the Three Evils Everywhere" lies in telling philosophy with stories.
in the film, Chen Guilin has been looking for the meaning of life throughout the film. This is an old topic in philosophy, but as long as we talk about philosophy, we need to face this problem first. When people begin to think about the meaning of their lives, they officially enter the period of personality. Of course, many times, the results we think about and the content of our implementation are also absurd. At the end of the film, Chen Guilin's life is also full of drama and absurdity.
People have left a name, geese have left a voice, Chen Guilin wants to be a "bandit" with a name and surname, which is also a big type in life choices. But this genre, in the end, is also absurd, and is treated as fun and story.
in the film, Aberdeen's paragraph, in fact, is philosophical and sociological content, and it is quite interesting. In this paragraph, the key point to solve the problem is the dialogue between Chen Guilin and the heroine after he killed Aberdeen and his later behavior. Chen Guilin asked the heroine, why did your mother follow Aberdeen so desperately. The heroine says that Aberdeen rescued her mother from another man. Later, Chen Guilin gave the car to the heroine, and the two parted ways.
This place, in the most common words, is that Aberdeen, a former dragon slaying boy, has become an evil dragon himself. Why did Chen Guilin part ways with the heroine?Because he didn't want to become a dragon himself. When the hero and heroine are talking at the beach, there are two excavators parked in the shot, which is an interesting picture, you can pay attention to it. In fact, friends who have studied world history also know that many sages of the continents, fighting, fighting, and succeeding, quit themselves and went home to retire. That's what it means.
Regarding the matter of going home to retire after a successful fight, many history and philosophy classes have answers, what, why, and how. I'm not going to drop my bag here. Chen Guilin's beating of Aberdeen is actually a use of this common sense in the history and philosophy class. It seems that many of our science students have not learned this common sense. I remember that this was taught in junior high school history class, and everyone should have learned it. But many of our history teachers are not at a good level, and we must pay attention to this matter.
in the film, the Venerable one, it is estimated that many fans will watch it very hilarious. But this kind of hilarity is based on the perspective of many fans from Chen Guilin's perspective. Personally, I tend to look at the story from the perspective of a specific individual in the auditorium. I'm not His Holiness, but I may be someone close to His Holiness, or someone who trusts His Holiness. When Chen Guilin pulled out his gun, did I want to run away, or did I die generously?
Let's first look at His Holiness's thoughts, if we can also take His Holiness's words as thoughts. He told everyone to let go, so that everyone had nothing outside of them, etc. The words themselves don't seem to be problematic. Chinese philosophy, Western philosophy, Indian philosophy, etc., all have this kind of thought. It's nothing, pediatric thoughts. It's interesting to know how to put it down. China's great thinker Wang Yangming also talked about letting go and having an epiphany.
**Among the relevant works of the old gentleman, there are many discussions on Wang Yangming's thought and its subsequent influence, which are very professional and accurate, and interested friends can find and read them by themselves. After reading it, you must think that the story of Venerable Venerable "Removing the Three Evils Around the World" is actually another ridicule of similar thoughts.
However, Wang Yangming advocates letting go, whether he really lets it go, and he puts it down first. His Holiness is fooling others to put it down and hiding it himself. This is actually facing a more interesting topic - the question of survival. I'm all gone, how can I survive. So, how much to let go and how to put it down is another philosophical question. The good thing about philosophy is to talk about degrees, the degrees of weights and measures, and to find this degree, rather than looking for two extremes.
In addition, when Chen Guilin shot in the auditorium, why didn't anyone leave? You could say that they were **. But what if His Holiness was not a deceived fellow, but vice versa, and a practitioner of the Tao himself? This matter needs to be viewed dialectically. For example, in "The Siege of October", Cixi also organized a group of people to shoot, why is there still a group of brothers who are willing to die generously? "Removing the Three Evils Around the World" and "The Siege of October" will have a peculiar effect when viewed together. This is the dialectic of Marxism.
When I'm in this kind of auditorium, am I right or wrong? Again, this is a philosophical question. Mr. Liang Wendao said some things in the show "Eight Points", which was very funny. He probably said that learning is actually a process of gradual doubt and perfection, and I doubt what I have learned, and I gradually perfect it in doubt. Skepticism and perfection are actually the attitude of learning.
Therefore, as soon as Mr. Liang Wendao's reading programs came up, there was a saying that "success is not guaranteed". This is different from many success storytellers, who first want to ensure your success, and then fool you. At this point, you must not wonder if there is a person surnamed Luo among the storytellers. For example, my junior brother, Luo Zhiyi.
Because I read some books, I was especially afraid of a group of people doing something together. For example, during the Chinese New Year, a group of people in the family gather around the table and eat and drink together. I always think this thing is similar to everyone singing together in the auditorium of "Eliminating the Three Evils Around the World". Fortunately, my uncles and uncles knew that I had this stinky problem, and assigned me to the kitchen early to stir-fry, I fry, and they ate and drank. The same is true for eating, and the same is true for others.
If we are in the auditorium, how to maintain a rational attitude of "doubt and perfection" in learning, or how to keep ourselves out of the auditorium, these are philosophical problems, and philosophy can be reflected in reality.
In fact, in "Removing the Three Evils Around the World", there are still a lot of fragmentary philosophical common sense, which are told in the form of stories. An interesting movie needs to have these philosophical thinking. (Wen Ma Qingyun).
Movie week eliminates three evils