In the face of the Ukrainian army's retreat, the European collective was stunned? Scholz dares to say more than Macron, no wonder Medvedev joked: European politicians are not as good as one generation after another, and they show every day what it means to have a "brain recession".
On February 26, France's ** Macron "In order to prevent Russia's victory, France is not ruled out from sending troops to Ukraine", this astonishing remark has not yet relieved Europe from fear, and on the 29th, German Chancellor Scholz's revelations once again caused an uproar in Europe.
The British "Daily Telegraph" reported that German Chancellor Olaf Scholz disclosed that British and French soldiers are in Ukraine, and the "Storm Shadow" cruise missiles launched in Ukraine are controlled by British and French missile launch teams. He also stressed that blindly following in the footsteps of Britain and France would put Germany in danger of becoming a "participant in the war."
As soon as the news came out, it immediately caused controversy in Europe, and many parties accused Scholz of "blatant abuse of intelligence", in order to divert the pressure of refusing to provide Taurus missiles to Ukraine, he even betrayed his allies, and did not hesitate to put the safety of British and French military and diplomatic personnel on the ground in danger, and also helped Russia by the way.
Scholz denied the accusations and explained that he was angry at the "siege" of the refusal to supply the Taurus missile, but he did not help Russia, which has aided more than France and any other country in Europe since the start of the war between Russia and Ukraine. The reason why Taurus missiles are not supplied is because it is feared that the Ukrainian army will attack a specific target somewhere in Moscow with missiles with a range of 500 km, and at that time, the war is bound to escalate, and Germany will not be able to avoid it.
Scholz's statement was seriously criticized by Britain, France and Germany, and the United Kingdom, probably fearing Russian retaliation, kicked the ball to Ukraine on the same day: "Britain and its allies are discussing providing Ukraine with a series of equipment, and the Ukrainian army attacked the Ukrainian armed forces with the 'Storm Shadow' attack on the Russian target." Carrots and sticks, for Ukraine, which lacks **, Zelensky will certainly not admit that the British and French soldiers are in Ukraine and help the Ukrainian army launch missiles to attack Russian targets.
The Ukrainian army's successive defeats made the West unable to sit still, first Macron said that he would not rule out sending troops, and the existing US Secretary of Defense Austin said in a speech to Congress on the 29th: Europe knows Putin's capabilities too well, and everyone will worry that their country will become next, if Ukraine falls, I really believe that NATO will go to war with Russia.
NATO has entered the market, whether it is Macron, Austin, or Scholz's casual truth, Russia will certainly not just listen. Putin recently signed an order to rebuild the Moscow Military District and the Leningrad Military District and strengthen the offensive capability, which is to prepare for a big battle.
The Russian-Ukrainian war has entered its third year, and the battlefield situation is basically clear, once the NATO army is directly defeated, Russia's hard-won advantage will come to naught overnight, which Russia absolutely cannot bear. At 5 p.m. on February 29, Putin made it very clear in his State of the Union address that Russia will never allow NATO troops to directly participate in the Russian-Ukrainian war, and if NATO troops appear in Ukraine, the consequences will be even worse, and bluntly warned: Russia has the ability to directly hit any country in Europe.
Putin's words are heavy, and now there is only one multiple-choice question before the West:
a.accept the reality of Ukraine's defeat;
b.directly send troops to war with Russia;
Peace or War? In the face of international calls for economic development, it is time for Europe to make a choice.