A proposal that provoked a heated discussion, directly to the problem, in one sentence. Such a discussion is good. Regardless of whether it is possible or not, you must show it to everyone, and then express your own opinions, so as to improve everyone's wisdom and distinguish between truth and falsehood, which can be regarded as a kind of education.
Some committee members suggested that as soon as the "accelerated evaluation of first-level (academician) students in the humanities" was promulgated, it aroused extensive discussions, indicating that this issue has not only attracted the attention of experts and scholars, but also has attracted the attention of all sectors of society, and there has been an intersection between the concerns of experts and the general public.
Looking further down, it seems that the focus of the discussion is not "the highest-level professor (academician)", but a sentence in the proposal: in the past 30 years, "the absence of academicians has had a great impact on the development of our society, so the review of first-class professors (academicians) in the liberal arts must be accelerated".
That's logical reasoning. Generally speaking, it is awarded to those who have made significant contributions to the country and the country, and people in the humanities are also people who have made significant contributions to the country and the country, so an academician is also awarded to the liberal arts. In other words, without academicians, it will have a great negative impact on the economic development of the whole country, and without this award, it will also have a great negative impact on the economic development of the whole country.
In fact, neither of these assumptions is valid, and there are no logical loopholes, which has caused heated discussions.
Theoretically speaking, not every academician has made great contributions to the country, and even some will have some adverse effects on the country, which is why some people are prejudiced against some academicians. Actually, it is not an easy thing for an academician.
From this point of view, it is really difficult for a humanities scholar to make a sudden contribution to society. Originally, there was also an academician of the College of Arts and Sciences, but it has been abolished. The reason for its repeal may be because it is unreasonable, or it may be because it is not feasible.
Academicians of the Chinese Academy of Sciences are members of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. In the beginning, both the Academician Council and the President were the main decision-making organs of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, so in 1979, Academician was only a working title, not an honorary title. It was not until 1984 that the title of academician became the highest award in the field of science and technology in our country.
In October 1993, the members of the Chinese Academy of Sciences were renamed the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the two departments of philosophy and social sciences were abolished. That's because after the Chinese Academy of Sciences became independent from the social sciences in 1977 to form the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, the Chinese Academy of Sciences naturally could not set up a literature department, so there were no so-called scholars from the humanities department.
When all humanities were abolished, there was a growing call for a re-establishment, because the social sciences were also a science and deserved to be treated in the same way as the natural sciences. See? The word "treatment" is accentuated.
Regardless of whether social sciences are considered sciences or not, even if you are an academician of a liberal arts college, it is difficult to gain unanimous recognition in the field of natural sciences in society, and even if it is established, it is a very awkward thing. It's not that some people feel that there is a school committee that can be set up, and not everyone agrees that they have made a significant contribution to the development of society.
A kind of scientific and technological innovation usually promotes the upgrading of a technology and a product, and has a great impact on all aspects of human society, which can be perceived by the public. On the contrary, the social sciences have made some achievements, but there are also some regressions.
Think about it carefully, in recent years, the emerging economics, how much impact it has had on the economy and society, some experts who have been blown up by the industry have been scolded by the people, you can imagine how much they have contributed to the world. And in the field of art, it's the same, there's nothing to like. Philosophy seems to have disappeared from the everyday life of man; The negative consequences of historians are still present today, and it is clear from the shocking statements made by the major literary schools in recent years, and the names given to them, that there has been no outstanding contribution (I will not say more about it here).
From this point of view, the "absence of an academy of sciences" has had a great negative effect on the social development of our country, which is not in line with reality. The biggest advantage of running an art academy is that it allows some people to get the same benefits as them. Isn't it too selfish for literary practitioners to understand the truth that "there is no gain without merit" and to treat those who have not made outstanding contributions as they should be?
Some people naturally know that in the humanities, there are many "major achievements" every year, and some works will form a complete series, or even dozens of works, as soon as they are published. But how many of them are really on fire? It's just a little trick in the circle, and it doesn't have much impact.
This is the basic problem of the development of the humanities, which is detached from the development of society and the daily life of the public, and has become a purely academic research, how can it make a sudden contribution to society? There are many problems in this world, and no scholar has ever come up with a solution that everyone can remember.
From a practical point of view, there is no shortage of top scientific researchers in this area, and their outstanding achievements are also obvious, such as space travel, manned deep diving, large passenger aircraft lift-off, microchip autonomy, shield and high-speed rail leading the world, aircraft carrier and large cruise ship construction. In contrast, in sociology, there is really no one who can compare to it. In such a situation, there are no people who engage in art at all, and they will not have any influence at all.
Natural science promotes the progress of scientific and technological achievements and material achievements, while social science promotes the progress of people's cultural and spiritual achievements. In fact, the first goal is easy to spot, and the second is ignored.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is an award that has made a significant contribution to society, and it stands to reason that anyone who has made an outstanding contribution, whether it is the humanities or the natural sciences, can be nominated. A person who hasn't made a significant contribution doesn't mean anything if it's just to get more honors, does it? Please leave a comment.
This article was originally published by "Life Lens", first published, plagiarism is not allowed; We do not have an account with the same name or other accounts; The information in this article and ** are from the Internet, if there is anything inappropriate, please let us know.
See this article (the original article is frequently moved and can be found on the front page):
Cancellation of two academicians": Do you want to disqualify two academicians?
The "five strokes", which were once popular all over the country, are no longer the style of the past, but they are still amazing.
Why is an "expert" always scolded?
28 newly promoted academicians, graduated from double non-famous universities: hard-working people are the backbone of science.
The cradle of academicians: 211 schools, Yoshikawa Lan is eye-catching, Fudan, a little embarrassed.