China successfully conducted its seventh land-based anti-missile interception test, yet the United States took the opportunity to create a "coincidence" and planned to launch a "Minuteman" missile at Kwajalein Island in the Pacific Ocean.
Americans' behavior is fraught with challenge and indomitable spirit. China has demonstrated the technology to have land-based interception capabilities, so the United States will also launch a missile, let's wait and see.
The fact that the United States chose to test-launch the "Minuteman" missile at this point in time shows that they are deliberately creating "coincidences" in terms of equipment experiments and great power competition, and appear to be extremely cautious.
The target of this land-based mid-course interception test is precisely the "Minuteman" missile, and the interception target is carried out during the mid-course flight stabilization phase.
American test launch"Militia"Missiles, intended to express anger and jealousy, but also reveal their backward technology. "Militia"Missiles have been around for more than half a century, and even the US Air Force and Strategic Command no longer pay attention to them.
In this case, the test launch of such an obsolete missile, in fact, is only a demonstration of its shortcomings to the outside world, and does not show any advantages. "Sentinel"Missiles are considered to be"Militia"but due to the slow pace of research and development, there is no deadline.
If the United States develops a new type of hypersonic stealth ballistic missile, this kind of ** will expose us to a greater military threat. The behavior of the Americans in doing so is undoubtedly "hitting the bull's eye" for us, or more precisely, "hitting the target," which falls into the range of our land-based mid-course anti-missile interception.
Thus, the performance of the "Minuteman" missile did not show its superiority. However, the United States has made a point of emphasizing that, first, they chose to conduct the experiment at this point in time; Secondly, their warheads are equipped with nuclear warheads and have strategic deterrence capabilities, which indicates that the United States faces certain difficulties in enhancing its strategic strike capabilities.
The U.S. is working on building multiple layers"Protective cover"to meet the challenges of strategic defense. However, neither the DF-17 nor the United States itself"**"The DF-27 boosts gliding supersonic warheads, or other hypersonic warheads, these"Protective cover"They all seem to be powerless and unable to intercept effectively.
If China can also demonstrate land-based mid-course anti-missile technology and make a breakthrough after the demonstration, then this will likely produce powerful reconnaissance, early warning and interception capabilities against existing boost-glide warheads, hypersonic warheads, etc.
This suggests that China's progress in terms of strategic deterrence and offensive capabilities worries the United States.
The United States is testing the Minuteman missile, and in this way they hope to demonstrate their strength and determination. However, the Americans are well aware that they are unable to break through the multi-layered defense system, especially the land-based midcourse interception technology that China is currently developing, which has an extremely high success rate.
Why, then, is the United States demonstrating at this time a warhead that cannot penetrate the defense system of the opposing side? The answer is obvious: the United States needs financial support. In terms of land-based missile technology, the United States is relatively weak, especially in forming a strong penetration capability, and there is a clear gap compared with Russia, North Korea, and other countries.
The problems of US land-based missiles are mainly manifested in two aspects: First, the research and development time has been too long, and it has long become the dust of history; The second is the lack of innovation in warhead technology, which cannot be compared with the Russian "Avangard" missile.
Therefore, it is urgent to upgrade the first-class missiles of the United States. With the rise of China and other emerging powers in missile technology, the United States' land-based missile combat capability and strike capability can no longer meet the needs of modern warfare, bringing a huge threat to the United States.
The key to solving this problem lies in increasing investment and providing sufficient financial and technical support to accelerate the research and development of the Sentinel land-based ICBM. Although the test has raised concerns among the American public, it also reflects the American strategy of testing to make up for technical deficiencies through testing.
In this regard, the United States has shown a high degree of tolerance and has been able to resolutely shift to new technological disciplines even in the face of failure.
In the field of land-based ballistic missiles, the United States once claimed that the probability of survival was low, believing that it was a waste for other countries to develop such missiles. However, it now seems that while the United States has advantages at the sea and air level, it has shortcomings on land.
Therefore, the United States has to take action to make up for this shortcoming and promote its own development by upgrading new land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles. Shortly after the successful test of a Chinese land-based midcourse missile, the United States conducted a so-called "Minuteman" missile test, indicating that its psychological endurance is relatively weak.
With China's rapid development, the United States is increasingly anxious. Therefore, we must work harder in the field of cutting-edge technology to challenge the leading position of the United States and break its mythical status.
By demonstrating its strength, China will demonstrate to the world that it is capable of maintaining global peace and security and creating a safer environment for the world.