Not long ago, the European Congress passed a resolution saying: "The two sides of the Taiwan Strait do not belong to each other, which is equivalent to not allowing the Chinese People's Liberation Army to "reunify by force."
Regarding the Taiwan issue, Serbian Vučić hit the nail on the head: "The Taiwan issue is very simple, and the Taiwan issue can be clearly explained in 10 seconds, Taiwan belongs to China, how to deal with it, how to deal with it, how to deal with it, how to deal with it, it is China's own business, and the Serbian people will always stand on your side." "However, the European Parliament voted 338 to 86, which may seem like a lot, but in fact, there have already been 338 votes against it, and there is not even an abstention.
The two bills, "Common Diplomacy and Security" and "Common Security and Defense", are one that says China will not renounce military action, and the other requires European countries to join international institutions such as the WHO in their "national capacity".
In the past two years, the European Congress has passed more than 20 bills, distorted the United Nations 2758, and supported Taiwan's ***, but in fact, he did not support Taiwan, nor did he support *** because many Europeans do not know that Taiwan is **, and even MPs do not know that Taiwan is **. In fact, they are all supporting the United States and escorting the United States' anti-Taiwan strategy. How can this be good? This is understandable, you can ignore them, but you should not underestimate them either.
First, neither of these two resolutions, nor the previous ones, fully represent the majority of Europe, and the European Parliament is only one of the three major organizations, and one of the three pillars, consisting of 27 member states, that is, all EU member states. There are 785 seats in the European Parliament, each of which can have more than one seat, with Germany holding 99 seats and Malta holding 5 seats. The 338 votes, almost all of which came from 27 countries, had more votes, but not everyone would vote for one person. Such a decision is not representative of the majority of EU member states, nor is it representative of Europe.
Second, let's return to the question of the legitimacy of the bill passed by the European Parliament, which is essentially non-binding. The European Parliament is like a "tea party", and in a certain sense, this election is more of a public opinion poll, representing the views of various countries on this issue, as if it were a tea party. These bills have been passed, but they are not binding. So, every country takes this into account when making its own decisions. The decisions made by the European Parliament cannot be enforced.
Third: This time, the United States launched a "united front" against China, which also includes the influence of "** elements on the European Congress, plus von der Leyen is about to **, the United States also wants to promote this, you look at von der Leyen, her attitude towards the United States, even European countries, it is impossible to tolerate her existence, because her relatives are all in the United States, no wonder some people will say that she is just the head of the US office in the European Union.
Although such a proposal does not have any substantive effect, it will make "resisting China and opposing China" a trend of social thought, which will be very harmful to us in the long run, so we must not take it lightly.