First, the court did not accept the Internet celebrity's lawsuit against Mo Yan. Fortunately, there is still common sense in society.
The second is that Mr. Hu Xijin also died two days ago, criticizing a group of people who are now indiscriminately buttoning people's hats under the banner of "patriotism", saying that this trend cannot be long.
As a result, the next day, the other side responded, saying that they would sue Hu Xijin. The words are also very righteous and awe-inspiring: "Suing Hu Xijin is fighting for today's patriotic people!" ”
I was quite surprised to see this news, because I instinctively felt that Mo Yan and Hu Xijin both had the same type of label in my impression, that is, they didn't cause trouble.
Needless to say, the old gentleman has always (especially after winning the Nobel Prize), and basically rarely expressed any opinions on the news in public. He was really just like his speech at the Nobel Prize, a "storyteller". So when I first joined the work 10 years ago, the general criticism of Mo Yan on the Internet was that others were like his name, "Mo Yan", and did not speak out.
And Mr. Hu Xijin, he often makes a voice or something, but if you often watch the news, you will know that he always feels like he speaks - when he encounters something, he must say, "For xxx, Lao Hu feels ......."Lao Hu still felt ......Lao Hu felt ...... againIn short, all sides have talked about it for you, and strive to achieve a feeling of "listening to your words, such as listening to a seat", it seems that a comment has written a thousand words, but your experience after reading it is often - "big sound Xisheng", said is equivalent to not saying ......To a certain extent, Editor-in-Chief Hu can be regarded as another sense of "Mo Yan". 
In short, these two people are the kind of people who are not so easy to provoke right and wrong in my impression, plus both of them have official status, one is a professor at Beijing Normal University, and the other is a retired editor-in-chief of the Global Times. Of course, I know that if I say this, someone must want to raise the bar - Mo Yan and Hu Xijin can't be criticized? Since they are writers and editors-in-chief, every reader has the right to criticize their views! Of course you're right. But I want to remind you of a basic fact: Mo Yan and Hu Xijin's matter in the stall-It's a lawsuit, it's a lawsuit, it's a lawsuit! Important words to say three times. 
Unlike ordinary criticism, prosecution has the force of law once it enters the judicial process and forms a verdict. Even if a judgment against the defendant is not rendered, or even judicial proceedings are not entered, in many cases, it will cause considerable distress to the parties. You see, the person who Zhang Luo sued Mo Yan has now gathered quite a lot of noise on the Internet, and has also caused tens of thousands of people to vote, and even this person has publicly threatened that if the formal legal process does not work, he will "use violent means" to ......I think this has escalated to a personal threat, for writers, editors, dislike, criticize, do not buy his books, shut down his Weibo, this is of course your freedom, but to sue or even threaten, this is too extreme and even paranoid. Of course, there are people who are extreme and paranoid all the time, but such an extreme and paranoid idea can actually gather on the Internet today and make such a big move. This is the point that is really frightening - I don't know if there will be other Internet celebrities who will come out to do the same after this precedent, and rely on showing or pretending to be extreme and paranoid to get ahead. And who is the next Internet celebrity? Who knows? Even Mo Yan and Hu Xijin are not insured, I don't think anyone can say that they are safe. Richelieu said it well: ".Give me one of the most honest men in the world, and let him write six lines, and I'll surely find enough reason to hang him. "Beria is more bullish:"Let me look at that guy and I'll tell you he's a criminal! "Thinking about it, what is the only difference between Mo Yan and Hu Xijin and ordinary people like us? It's just that they're more famous than us. 
In the fable of the dark forest of "The Three-Body Problem", "being seen" is a sin in itself, because you broadcast your coordinates to the whole universe, and for other civilizations, it has almost no cost to hit you, it can be a "light particle" or a "two-way foil", for the supergod civilization, it has been popularized to the extent that individuals can use it almost at will. Since there's zero cost, why not do it? Now that you've been seen by everyone, how can you be sure that no one will come and beat you up? So once this logic works, all the "broadcasters" or "broadcasters" are dangerous, and no matter what you broadcast to the universe, "being seen" itself becomes a sin. So when I saw that Internet celebrity show off the call list he was queuing up to sue Mo Yan in court, I really wanted to say:Look at this piece of paper, it's small and thin, it doesn't look like the legendary two-way foil? 
And those who like and follow Mo Yan on the Internet, what they voted for is a grain of light, right? Yesterday I said in the article that I don't like some of Da Liu's story logic, because he always forces human beings into some very extreme environmental blind spots, in which normal human nature has become extravagant, hypocritical and virgin. Then Da Liu criticized these normal human natures. It's uncomfortable to watch. But after writing that article, I reflected that I felt that the fault was not necessarily in Da Liu, he just used science fiction to depict a hell for us, which is his creative freedom. No one has the right to sue him for hurt feelings. The important thing is that we should avoid recreating this nightmare in reality. Therefore, I am opposed to and even disgusted with anyone who tries to engage in "light particles" and "two-way foils" in reality. Because we have entered the age of the Internet, where "everyone can be famous for fifteen minutes", anyone can be a broadcaster or be broadcaster. And even if you don't make a living from codewords, your online speech must add up to more than six lines, right? Do you feel that you can guarantee that what you say can withstand this is like the guy who sued Mo Yan and asked him to "pay all Chinese a dollar each", don't look at him in the name of patriotism, but does he think that he can escape this law and be absolutely safe under this banner? Isn't it? This person asked Mo Yan to pay each Chinese one dollar, is this suspected of "paying tribute" to the eight-nation alliance commander Wadsey who made each Chinese pay one or two **? What is your heart? Again, is it true that in your mind, every Chinese national feeling is really seriously hurt, and it is only worth one dollar? Why do you despise our national feelings so much? Is it okay for everyone to sue you and make you pay 1.5 trillion or something? And what is quite interesting is that when he announced that he wanted to sue Hu Xijin, although this person kept saying that "suing Hu Xijin is to fight for today's patriotic people!" But the target of 1.5 billion is no longer mentioned. It's actually quite strange. Because I bet that the common people in China are accustomed to hearing that Editor-in-Chief Hu will "think that old Hu thinks...... when something happensLao Hu felt ...... againThere are definitely more people than people who have really seen Mo Yan**. I think the pole lifter is really clever here—because any crazy thing that happens once is a tragedy, and a second time it is a farce, and everybody is aware of its absurdity. Just imagine, if he sues Editor-in-Chief Hu for 1.5 billion yuan, the sense of absurdity of this matter will surge. In the future, the claim of 1.5 billion yuan may become a ridiculous stalk, and he will lose the sense of righteousness he wants. Maybe when you go to the park, you spit and throw debris, or someone can jump out and say that you actually destroy the public environment, I have already taken pictures with my mobile phone! If you post it online, you will hurt the feelings of all Chinese, so I will first claim 1.5 billion yuan from you on behalf of all Chinese! Ridiculous or not? Sewing madness? But that's the result of this logic. A war of all against all. 
It seems to have grown again, and my arm began to hurt again. Actually, Mo Yan is similar to Mo Yan and Lao Hu's "Lao Hu still thinks", and I am also a person who doesn't want to make trouble. So I have no heart or power to argue with those who are bigoted. I just want to make one request: when this person "claims compensation from Mo Yan on behalf of all Chinese", don't bring me to !! First, he sued without my consent, and he could not represent me. Second, I didn't think Mr. Mo Yan or Editor-in-Chief Hu hurt my feelings. Third, even if it really hurts, why is my relationship so cheap, only worth a dollar? I feel that engaging in this kind of farce is really insulting me and insulting the society I live in that hopes for peace, stability, and a peaceful life.