There is this passage in the book: The master is gone, and there is no master.
Just by this sentence, it can be seen that the book is full of spirit, since it is full of subjective assumptions about that period of China's history (**including New China), and cannot correctly judge history, the writer may have been on the mountains and the countryside, and he can also be treated unfairly, and he is dissatisfied, so he criticizes that period of history with his own metaphor.
Now people with good deeds on the Internet are going to take Mo Yan (a famous Chinese writer and Nobel Prize winner) to court for slandering revolutionary martyrs. As for whether Mr. Mo sincerely or unintentionally created his "scar literature", but now that people's minds have awakened, they can't let a few masters go up and talk about it, and the people listen to it and let it dance with the wind.
This "Crossing the South and Returning to the North" is also an example of "scar literature", as an outsider, I would like to talk about my point of view, which is different from the author's view of the times.
Just as I am a member of the grassroots workers, sometimes I am often treated unfairly (such as not receiving my wages in time, and sometimes even deliberately withheld), but I am full of gratitude and hope for our country and our time, after all, only when the country is strong can we have hope. Although sometimes out of resentment and selfishness, it is not in business, and out of appearance, it is better for some people to "work hard".
Some people talk about the fate of a few literati in the old days, and I think they mean drunkards.
The following picture is a report card on the scientific and technological front achieved by the People's Republic of China in the past 27 years.
Seeing this, there is a clear gap between these achievements and some of those of that era.
The following set of data, which is publicly reported on the Internet, is very different from some people's views on that era.
In 1949 the population of our country was 5416.7 billion, with a population of 9 in 19763.7 billion;
In 1949 the illiteracy rate in our country was 90 per cent, and in 1976 the illiteracy rate in our country fell to 20 per cent;
In 1949, the average life expectancy in China was 35 years, and in 1976 (some say 1978), the average life expectancy in China reached 68 years;
In 1949, China's grain production was only 2263600 million catties, China's grain output in 1976 reached 286.31 million tons;
In 1978, the net enrollment rate was 94 percent, the highest number of students in history, and the number of scientific and technological workers increased tenfold from less than 50,000 in 1949 to more than 5 million in 1978. In 1949, the difference between the national economy and the United States was 28 times, and by 1978 it was only 552 times; From 1950 to 1976, China's industrialization rate increased by 125%, the national economic growth 112%；Steel grew 129 times; power generation increased by 47 times; Oil increased by 726 times; Fertilizers have increased by 874 times ......
In 1977, China's grain could provide 500 billion catties of strategic grain reserves for Chinese people for three years, with more than 600 tons ......of ** and more than 2 billion US dollars in foreign exchange, the state had neither foreign debts nor national debts, and prices have remained stable for a long time
The comprehensive national strength has jumped to the top three, and the completed industrial categories are complete, and the achievements of national defense have also attracted the attention of opponents. In the early days of liberation, China even needed to import nails, and by 1976, China's atomic bombs, hydrogen bombs, and satellites had been installed.
If you don't have a dark heart for these achievements, you will definitely find them, and you will be proud of them. But why do some people fail to see these achievements, deliberately avoid them, and even slander and slander them?
Is anyone really learning from the former Soviet writer Sorenitsyn who won the Nobel Prize for deliberately depicting the shortcomings of that era, and finally repented of his actions?
A book that vents emotions, the book is just a haze in one's own heart, to express one's dissatisfaction, and to mislead the reader.