With regard to the incident involving the collision with a mainland fishing boat, cross-strait communication and negotiations, which had already moved toward a settlement, encountered twists and turns. The Taiwan side suddenly overturned the previous consensus and was unwilling to apologize, hold accountable, or compensate, resulting in a complicated change in the situation. Although the two sides are still communicating and negotiating, the denial attitude of Guan Biling, chairman of Taiwan's "Maritime Affairs Commission," has made the situation worse. This move aroused strong opposition from the Kuomintang, and even mobilized a Class A operation, demanding that Guan Biling explain clearly in order to set the record straight. In the midst of this turmoil, the mainland is full of ambitions, Taiwan is full of crises, and how the contradictions between the two sides will evolve is thought-provoking.
Guan Biling turned her back on her previous attitude and denied the occurrence of the incident of ramming a mainland fishing boat, which made the already complicated situation even worse. Not only did she overturn her previous claims, but she also blatantly distorted the facts, refused to apologize, and even tried to cover up the truth of the incident. This kind of backsliding behavior is intolerable, especially as a university professor, she should be more cautious in her words and deeds and lead by example. The Kuomintang resolutely opposed this, believing that Guan Biling's actions were irresponsible. Guan Biling's move also triggered a warning from retired Taiwan general Li Zhengjie that the mainland will never tolerate the collision incident being denied, which may lead to more serious consequences.
Guan Biling's attitude in dealing with the incident of ramming a mainland fishing boat has been repeated, sometimes admitting negligence and sometimes denying the occurrence of the incident. This irresponsible performance is incomprehensible and shocking both inside and outside Taiwan. The Kuomintang expressed strong dissatisfaction with this and demanded that it give a clear account and never allow it to evade its responsibilities. Guan Biling's denial has also aroused the vigilance of Li Zhengjie, a vigilant retired general from Taiwan, who believes that the mainland will never accept and tolerate such behavior, which may have a serious impact on future development.
Hong Mengkai, secretary general of the Kuomintang Caucus, expressed strong opposition to Guan Biling's denial, believing that her behavior was unprecedented and seriously hurt the harmony of the people. Kuomintang "legislator" Xu Qiaoxin even said bluntly that Guan Biling's words and deeds are capricious, how can she be competent for important duties? The incident also prompted the Kuomintang to launch a Class A mobilization and demand an explanation from Guan Biling to calm the people's anger. In the face of the Kuomintang's hard-line stance, Guan Biling will face pressure and doubts from all sides.
Regarding the mainland's attitude toward the Taiwan collision incident, retired Taiwan General Li Zhengjie made a judgment that does not allow for optimism. He believes that the mainland will never accept the denial of the incident and may take severe action against it. Li Zhengjie even pointed out that if the incident is not properly resolved, it may trigger a greater conflict, or even the People's Liberation Army (PLA) to recover Taiwan by force. He speculated about a possible military conflict, believing that when the PLA first landed on Taiwan, it would choose to carry out operations in the northern region in order to achieve a quick victory. Li Zhengjie's worries also reflect the complexity and sensitivity of the current situation.
In response to Guan Biling's denial of the collision incident with a mainland fishing boat, the Kuomintang launched a Class A mobilization aimed at investigating the truth and maintaining stability in the Taiwan Strait. The secretary general of the Kuomintang Caucus, legislators, and retired generals have expressed their positions, demanding that Guan Biling explain clearly to the people and never allow evasion and prevarication of responsibility. The aim is to strengthen the constraints on responsible parties and create a more conducive environment for future development.
The Kuomintang was extremely angry at Guan Biling's denial, so it decided to carry out a Class A mobilization to force her to confess the truth of the incident. Hong Mengkai, secretary general of the Kuomintang Caucus, said that it is necessary to resolutely oppose Guan Biling's backsliding behavior and demand that she have the courage to face problems and earnestly assume responsibility. Kuomintang Legislator Hsu Qiao-hsien further proposed that all evidence and information related to the fishing boat incident should be made public, so that the people on both sides of the strait can jointly understand the full picture of the incident and provide more references for resolving the problem. Chen Yuzhen, a Kuomintang "legislator" from Kinmen, also put forward suggestions such as the identification of professional units and the participation of family members, so as to promote the investigation and resolution of the incident and prevent the incident from further deteriorating.
The KMT's attitude towards Guan Biling has changed significantly, and they have taken a hard line against her denial, demanding that she have the courage to face up to the problem and take responsibility. The KMT's Class A mobilization also reflects the importance it attaches to stability in the Taiwan Strait, and hopes to take this opportunity to urge the relevant parties to face up to the problem and speed up the resolution of the problem. Guan Biling is forced to face pressure and doubts from the Kuomintang and other parties, and her choice will directly affect the direction of the situation.
Taiwan's retired general Li Zhengjie gave an early warning of the mainland's reaction and possible actions, saying that the mainland will never accept the incident being denied and may take more severe measures. Li Zhengjie made a judgment on possible military conflicts in the future, and pointed out the possible locations and targets of the PLA when it first landed on Taiwan, reflecting his concern and vigilance about the situation in the Taiwan Strait.
Taiwan's retired general Li Zhengjie gave an early warning of the mainland's reaction and possible actions, pointing out that the mainland will never tolerate the incident being denied and may adopt a tougher attitude. He believes that if the incident cannot be properly resolved, it may lead to a greater crisis or even a military conflict. Li Zhengjie's early warning highlights the uncertainty and tension of the situation in the Taiwan Strait, and also reminds the Taiwan side to respond cautiously to avoid further deterioration of the situation.
Li Zhengjie made a judgment on the possible actions of the PLA, believing that when the PLA first landed on Taiwan, it would choose to be in the northern region and directly aim at Taipei City as a possible target. Because the Taipei area concentrates Taiwan's political and economic points, it is the preferred location for the PLA to carry out landing operations. Li Zhengjie's analysis shows a deep understanding of military operations and reveals possible strategic moves by the PLA, providing an important reference for Taiwan's future response.
Guan Biling denied ramming a mainland fishing boat, and the Kuomintang launched a Class A mobilization, and Taiwan retreat will warn the mainland of possible actions. At present, it is complex, and various contradictions and challenges are intertwined. Against this backdrop, it has become a shared responsibility of all parties to remain calm and prudent. Guan Biling's repeated attitude, the strong mobilization of the Kuomintang, and the early warning of the retired generals in Taiwan are all microcosms of the current situation in the Taiwan Strait. In the future, Taiwan needs more rational and steady voices to lead both sides towards peace and stability. It is hoped that through the efforts and communication of both sides, differences can be resolved, risks can be resolved, and better development can be ushered in.