Musk believes that Donbass and Crimea should belong to Russian territory, emphasizing the supremacy of strength, and is shocked by reality.
Musk, the richest man in the world, advocates that the West should recognize Donbass and Crimea as belonging to Russia. This statement is not only mentioned in the present, but also in history. He once said: "Crimea belongs to Russia, and whether the other four regions belong to Russia should be decided by a referendum organized by the United Nations, and if the result of the United Nations referendum recognizes the belonging of Russia, it should be followed." Now Musk has changed his tune and believes that Donbass and Crimea should be assigned to Russia. This shift in attitude stems from Prince, the founder of the US private military company Blackwater, who advocated that Donetsk and Luhansk should be ceded to Russia in order to end the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. To this, Musk responded that this is an unfortunate fact.
In Musk and Prince's view, strength is paramount, and everything is based on strength. They are convinced that a lack of strength will bring everything to naught. As far as international law is concerned, flashiness is only falsehood, and only strength can demonstrate hegemony. This is also the dilemma facing the international community today. Both Musk and Prince are power supremacists, and they believe that mastering power will bring everything. Prince also said that it is not wise to make Ukraine a member of NATO, because Russia made great sacrifices in World War II, and if there are more unfriendly countries around it than at any time since 1945, it will be a threat to Russia and the bottom line. Therefore, he believes that it would be unwise to let Ukraine join NATO.
Prince advocated the cession of Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk to Russia, with an emphasis on strength and historical concepts.
Prince believes that Ukraine should cede Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk to Russia in order to eliminate the conflict. He pointed out that Russia suffered heavy losses in World War II, but defeated the Nazis with rich sacrifices. However, it is a red line that hostile countries around Russia now more than at any time since World War II, posing a threat to Russia. Therefore, Prince insisted that it was not a good idea to let Ukraine join NATO.
Musk and Prince uphold the value of strength first, believing that strength is everything. In their view, mastery of strength is better than justice, and strength shows hegemony. Although the international community upholds justice, strength is the benchmark for judging a country's status. In this sense, Musk and Prince's views are different from those of many politicians, focusing more on substance and getting to the heart of things. Their position may be controversial, but in today's international order, where power reigns, we cannot ignore the realities and problems they reflect.
Musk and Prince advocate the supremacy of strength, emphasizing that strength determines status, and advocating adjusting boundaries according to the actual situation. In international relations, the influence of power cannot be ignored, and unequal power often leads to conflicts and games. However, the primacy of power is also controversial, challenging the international order and the rule of law. From an ideological point of view, the international community advocates fairness and justice, but in reality, political games are often based on strength, leading to the reality that the law of the jungle is the strong. The remarks of Musk and Prince represent a kind of realist thinking, balancing the contradiction between idealism and realism, and reconciling the pluralistic interests of international politics.
At present, although the international community advocates the international rule of law, strength remains the pillar of international politics. Those who put power first explain the importance of power through their actions and try to reconstruct the international order. However, the supremacy of strength must be built on the basis of fairness and justice, otherwise it will bring more conflicts and contradictions. Musk and Prince's rhetoric reminds the international community that strength and justice must be balanced, and that reality and ideas must be balanced in order to seek peace and stability.
Musk and Prince advocate the supremacy of strength, emphasizing that strength is above all else. However, strength and justice are not opposites, but complement each other. In international relations, strength is undoubtedly an important influence, but it can only be exerted within a reasonable and just framework. The international community should not only focus on power, but also on fairness and justice in order to promote global peace and development.
Musk and Prince stand in the position of the supremacy of strength, highlighting the importance of strength. However, it should be recognized that everything that comes with strength must be based on fairness and justice, otherwise it will fall into chaos and turmoil. The international community needs to balance power and justice to promote a more just and stable international order. Only within the framework of the symbiosis and harmony of strength and justice can international relations achieve true harmony and prosperity.
In the discussion between Musk and Prince, the idea of the supremacy of strength provoked deep thought. Strength is important, but what is even more important is the use of strength within a fair framework. International relations should not be guided by might, but should be guided by fairness and justice, and seek true peace and prosperity. The international community needs to maintain its strength, pay attention to the rule of law and morality, and build a fair and just international order.
The symbiosis and coexistence of strength and justice reflect the complexity and multidimensionality of international relations. The views represented by Musk and Prince remind us that we need to comprehensively consider multiple factors such as strength, justice, and interests when dealing with international affairs, and carefully weigh the interests of all parties to create a more just and stable international order. May the international community achieve harmony and win-win results and build a better future through the dual-track symbiosis of strength and justice.