When Mo Yan won the Nobel Prize, many people think that Mo Yan caters to the West and surrenders to the West. In fact, the Nobel Prize chose Mo Yan, and it is necessary to treat Mo Yan as a chess piece, which is a kind of cultural infiltration. Its purpose may be to disrupt the domestic order and make you **. If you're divided into two factions and you're arguing, you may be playing right into them.
In order to get rid of Xiang Yu's adviser Fan Zeng, when Xiang Yu's envoy came, Liu Bang first arranged a sumptuous banquet, then withdrew it and replaced it with crude food, and said, I thought it was the person who came from the father, but it turned out to be King Xiang's person. Then as soon as the messenger went back and relayed it, Xiang Yu began to suspect Fan Zeng, and finally Fan Zeng was not trusted, was forced to leave, fell ill and died, and Xiang Yu was quickly defeated.
The West awarded the Nobel Prize to Mo Yan, which is a bit like the peach that killed three scholars in ancient times. A reward can make people fight, fight, no longer united, hostile to each other, that is really cost-effective.
A lot of the content written by Mo Yan is the same as Yu Hua. If Mo Yan smeared the country, then Yu Hua's "Brothers", "Alive" and "Xu Sanguan Selling Blood" can also be considered the same. Of course, what they write is not a smear, but a reproduction of what happened today and is incomprehensible to today. The purpose of reproducing history is to let people not heal their scars and forget the pain, but to remind people to learn lessons and avoid mistakes again, so as to make society develop better and achieve steady and far-reaching results.
Qu Yuan scolded the King of Chu, did he want to curse the King of Chu to death? Obviously not, he hopes that the state of Chu will be good. Is it for self-abuse? Obviously not, but to remind yourself not to forget the pain of destroying the country, to remind yourself to remember the lesson, and to be angry and strong.
And not only Mo Yan Yuhua, among contemporary writers, the writers who have written reflections on the history of the first 30 years are a whole generation of writers who have experienced that era, and there are countless writers and works. Scar literature and reflective literature are right in the general direction for the "restoration" and thinking of history, which is people-oriented, responsible for the future, and stands at the bottom of the position.
Of course, local problems, or some deviations, are inevitable. After all, writers are also human beings, and they are also products of the times, with the flaws of the times, and they are not perfect gods.
Moreover, the creation of scar literature and reflective literature has continued until the present and will not disappear for a long time to come. That kind of critical and reflective creation will not be broken. This should be allowed, and a healthy and uplifting society should allow different voices to exist. Only a person who is weak and sick is sensitive and afraid of others saying that he is not in good health.
The problem here is that if we admit that the past is problematic, then there is obviously no problem in criticizing problematic times. If you think that there was no problem with that era, then criticizing the past becomes discrediting that era.
There were many people who supported and loved that era, and there were many people who opposed and disliked that era.
Mo Yan is the unlucky guy caught in the middle. In fact, it is in response to that sentence: the gun shoots the first bird. Who made you the first to win the Nobel Prize? Mo Yan is not just one, but an entire generation of writers is mostly Mo Yan, and most of them are critical of the past. But only Mo Yan is the chosen son, and he has become a scapegoat to be sacrificed.
Why does a generation of writers critique the past? This comes back to the understanding of the past, in which there is also the question of the rotation of zeitgeists. They have experienced that era, suffered too many sins, and have seen the sins of the common people, they came from that era, and they know the problems of that era. Moreover, because people's minds have changed, Zuo's trend of thought is no longer popular, and You's trend of thought soon arises, so there is a generation of writers' collective criticism and collective reflection on history.
The reason why Mo Yan became the focus of attention is also because of the general environment. You's trend of thought has prevailed for more than 20 years, and Zuo's era has been defeated and denied writers, such as Shen Congwen, Zhang Ailing, and Xu Zhimo, have become the darlings of the new era, while the previously respected "Song of Youth", "Red Flag Spectrum", "History of Entrepreneurship", etc. have been neglected.
Nowadays, feng shui is in turn, and with the increase of national strength, the people no longer want to see criticism's works, and Mo Yan's works are no longer appropriate today. In the first decade of the last century, when we were still relatively poor, the voice of criticizing the domestic and beautifying foreign countries was very loud, and now this kind of voice can no longer be released, and it will be sprayed to death.
The Fang Fang diary incident is a typical example of "untimely". Fang Fang insisted on a critical stance, and in a special period, which caused a siege. The reason is that this is no longer an age of criticism, not an age of reflection, but an age of excitement and pride.
If you look at how smart online writers are, they don't write this kind of criticism, they just play time-traveling, fantasy, and overhead. Why be Qu Yuan? Isn't it good to be Dongfang Shuo? Like Deyun Club, telling jokes can get thousands of praises from Jinshan Yinshan, which is what the people need most.
The Spring Festival account in Lu Xun's diary.
Writer Sanmao: My ideal is to pick up the rags.
Wei Yan, who is straightforward and funny, has great achievements, but must die.