Controversy Project
I graduated from university 20 years ago, and in that era, foreign enterprises, private enterprises, and private enterprises were booming, and state-owned enterprises and civil servants were not the first choice for young people.
Many young people are reluctant to stay in state-owned enterprises, feeling that this is a place that can be seen at a glance, and they are unwilling to see what they look like when they retire at such a young age, and they are willing to go to companies outside the system to experience the grandeur of life. But the ideal is very plump, and the reality is very skinny. Gradually, I finally realized what is the day of the end at a glance, and this kind of day makes you wonder what your future is. There is a career crisis at the age of 35, and unemployment in middle age at the age of 40, layoffs, bankruptcies, unemployment, and delayed retirement. It's really hard to see.
After graduating, my classmate worked in a state-owned enterprise, and then he was unwilling to live a stable life, so he jumped to a foreign company, and then a private company, and now he has become a freelancer at the age of 40. He said that his greatest feeling was that he finally understood why socialism would eventually triumph over capitalism! State-owned enterprises bear responsibility, while private enterprises are profit-seeking. When you can't do it anymore, do you think state-owned enterprises will want you? State-owned enterprises are people, and everyone earns the country's money together. When private companies do things, everyone is exploited by the boss together.
What is the biggest difference between state-owned enterprises and private enterprises? A small example can be given. At 2 o'clock in the afternoon, in many state-owned enterprises is a lunch break, in state-owned enterprises for 2 hours at noon, most of them go to eat in advance, and there is half an hour to return to their senses after the lunch break. In private enterprises, the lunch break is 12:30-13:00, a total of one hour, and I often work until 13:00 to eat, but if you dare not start work at 13:35, criticism and deduction of money are indispensable. State-owned enterprises, tired from work, pick up the mobile phone to look at it, rub the temples; Private companies don't dare at all, and after a day of work, you can glance at your mobile phone during your lunch break.
State-owned enterprise attendance is indeed very loose, and you only need to say it in the group to ask for leave. However, the reimbursement is very strict, mainly because it is now strictly checked, and there is no compensatory leave for overtime, that is, you can eat for free. It doesn't matter, there isn't much room for growth, so the old man who is not bad for money will not work much. There are also benefits, but now there are fewer and fewer, there used to be a monthly health care fee, a shopping card at the end of the year, holiday gifts, etc., now there are only gifts. The practice of rough economy is common, and things such as buying things regardless of the cost and serious waste are common.
State-owned enterprises are similar to the college entrance examination, strict entry and wide exit. School recruitment generally goes back to school, and large-scale recruitment only exists in new construction or expansion, and there will be no store after this village. The other is social recruitment, which doesn't matter if you have a background and money, you can't get in. As for talents, a good job does not necessarily lead to a good harvest, so many people have lived a lifetime in a mess. The leaders of state-owned enterprises are all dragons and phoenixes, and the leaders of private enterprises are not dry meals. State-owned enterprises can afford to pay for their own sons, and even zombie enterprises can survive if they can't afford to lose, and private enterprises can only bear their own losses. Therefore, the vitality of private enterprises is more prosperous than that of state-owned enterprises, which is recognized by the state. There are thousands of domestic private enterprises, and there are only a few famous ones that attach importance to talents, and most of them are still ruthless to employees.
The decision-making of state-owned enterprises is risk-controlled; The decision-making of private enterprises is opportunistically oriented. Because of this, state-owned enterprises are inefficient. It doesn't matter if state-owned enterprises make money or not, because it doesn't belong to anyone who makes money. However, there must be a complicated process to regulate various behaviors and comply with regulations.
For example, if you simply buy something for 10,000 yuan in the market, a private company may directly find a ** merchant to buy it, or buy it directly online. But the state-owned enterprises want to bid, to open the market inquiry, and finally do a long time, finalize a **business, **7000 yuan, but the ** business does not sell! Because you only need one piece, the amount is too small! Not for sale!! Then it entered a dead end, 10,000 can't be bought, 8,000 don't want to sell, what do you say? No leader is willing to make a decision to let you go directly to a ** merchant to buy the 10,000 yuan product, otherwise the Commission for Discipline Inspection will ask you why you buy 10,000 if you don't buy 8,000? Doing things for the company, half a dime has no benefits, who wants to do it when it causes trouble?
Regardless of state-owned enterprises or private enterprises, people in the workplace, no matter what kind of environment they are in, have their own rules of survival, more observation, more summary, no matter where you work, you should maintain a normal heart.