The social security was withdrawn from the lowest level in Dongguan, 140,000 a year, and it was deci

Mondo Social Updated on 2024-03-08

Today, I made a decision that was quite important to me - to withdraw from Dongguan's social security. It wasn't an easy decision because I had the lowest level of social security and I had to pay 1About 40,000. This amount has gradually become a burden on my financial situation, and it is too much to bear.

Social security, which is originally a system to ensure the basic social welfare of citizens, has become an economic burden at the level of an individual. Looking back, social security has become an annual expense that I have to face, and this number has continued to climb. For an ordinary worker, the increase in social security costs means a decrease in salary, and the pressure on life gradually increases.

I buy the lowest level of social security, but even so, 1The amount of $40,000 is a significant part of my financial plan. Among the various expenses of urban life, I have been stretched thin by rent, living expenses, etc., and the increase in social security costs has made the whole financial pressure worse. So, I began to seriously think about whether it was worth continuing to pay for this social security.

The original intention of the social security system is to help every citizen to receive social support and protection at all stages of birth, old age, sickness and death. In reality, some people give up buying because they can't afford the high cost of social security, or choose the lowest grade to cope with the pressure of life. This also raises a profound social question: does the social welfare system really cover everyone and protect everyone's basic rights and interests?

For me personally, the increase in social security has become an unbearable burden. It's not that I'm unwilling to take responsibility for social welfare, but I feel a little helpless when I pay such a high amount of money and not being actually protected. Social Security became a burden on my life, and I made the difficult decision to surrender it.

This decision is not only an economic issue, but also a question of the social system. Equity and universality of social welfare are issues of common concern. For individuals like me, I feel helpless about the increase in social security costs, and for society as a whole, how to better protect the basic rights and interests of every citizen is also an urgent problem to be solved.

Perhaps, we need to carry out in-depth reflection and reform of the social security system to make it better serve every citizen. To set more reasonable contribution standards and ensure the sustainability of the social security system, it is also necessary to make it affordable for more people. In this way, the social security system can truly cover everyone and provide strong protection for everyone.

When I filled out the application form for social security surrender, my heart was full of contradictions and helplessness. It wasn't the outcome I wanted, but in the current situation, it seemed like the only way out I could choose. Perhaps, one day in the future, the social security system will be better improved and become a social welfare system that truly considers every citizen. With the withdrawal of social security, I felt a sense of freedom and relaxation, but at the same time, it was difficult to hide some uneasiness in my heart. This decision gave me a lot to think about, not only about the social welfare system, but also about the choices individuals make in the face of the pressures of life.

The social security system exists to protect the basic rights and interests of every citizen and provide a social safety net. As social security costs climb year by year, some people are starting to opt out, does this mean that the system is failing? Or is it because the design of the system is irrational? This requires us to think deeply and study.

For me, the increase in social security costs has become an unbearable burden, but it has also raised a number of questions. Does surrender mean that a social responsibility has been abandoned? Under the squeezing social welfare resources, everyone is making choices for their own interests, is this contrary to the overall interests of society?

Perhaps, we need to think about a more comprehensive solution. In the social security system, more of the burden can be shared by raising taxes. It is also necessary to design the social security system more scientifically to ensure the rationality and transparency of the cost and avoid becoming a heavy burden that individuals cannot afford.

Society should be more inclusive of those who opt out because they cannot afford social security. We should not simply see it as "evading responsibility", but should go deep into the reasons behind the ** and actively look for solutions so that everyone can enjoy the practical benefits of social welfare.

The decision to surrender the policy also made me reflect on my lifestyle. With society changing and the cost of living rising, individuals need to be more flexible in adjusting their lifestyles in the face of high costs. Perhaps, we need to find a more rational model of social welfare, so that everyone can get the protection they deserve while they can afford it.

In this society, everyone is striving for their own future, and the social system should provide everyone with fair opportunities. In the pursuit of a better life, we also need to constantly think about how to build a more just and inclusive society together, so that everyone can find their own warm corner in this big family.

The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any of the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.

Related Pages