Recently, a shocking incident occurred in a blind massage parlor in Guangzhou. In the process of enjoying a massage service, a customer was unfortunately encountered by a technician who was suspected of overstepping the line and making inappropriate physical contact with him. However, when the incident was discovered, the owner and some of the store staff questioned the victim's accusations.
The female customer visited a nearby massage parlor for the blind for the first time after moving, and chose the No. 8 technician recommended by the store for massage services. At first, the process was unusual, but then when massaging the right side of the neck, the technician claimed that "the area leading to the breast was a little blocked", and began to massage the client's chest excessively, and even pinched the chest. Although the customer felt unwell and struggled at the time, due to the suddenness of the incident and the awkward situation, he did not express his objection at the first time.
Afterwards, the customer communicated with other customers who received the same ** service and found that there were no similar massage steps, so as to confirm that he may have been mistreated. When communicating with the shopkeeper, although the female shopkeeper said that the store stipulates that technicians are not allowed to touch customers' chests, there is a certain degree of prevarication in the face of customer complaints. Among them, a male staff member in the store even questioned the victim, emphasizing that because there was no monitoring equipment installed in the massage room, and the technician firmly denied the excesses, it was impossible to confirm the authenticity of the customer's statement. In particular, he pointed out that if there was indeed a problem, why the customer did not immediately resist at the scene, suggesting that it could be the customer's own problem.
Faced with such a response, the victim woman was deeply angry and helpless, insisting that her rights and interests had been seriously violated. Eventually, she chose to call the police to seek a just solution. **After intervening in the investigation, although no further legal action could be taken due to the lack of direct evidence, the incident undoubtedly sounded the alarm bell for the store to pay attention to the quality of service and the professional ethics of employees.
The whole incident has aroused widespread concern in the society, and there has been a heated discussion around the question of "whether the victim should immediately and explicitly resist when he is violated". Many netizens expressed sympathy and support for the victims, emphasizing that consumers have the right to expect respect and protection under any circumstances, and that failure to resist in time should not be used as the basis for determining responsibility. At the same time, it calls on relevant industries to strengthen supervision, improve the professionalism of employees, and ensure that similar incidents are not repeated.